Western Sport Apparel Brands in a Wanghong Economy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Lululemon's Influencer Branding
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As Western sporting brands navigate China's complex digital consumer economy, they face unique challenges amid rising economic nationalism and state support/subsidization for domestic brands. In this context, understanding platform-specific influencer (wanghong) economic relations become crucial for analyzing market penetration, particularly as China's digital ecosystem operates distinctly from Western social media environments. While sport management researchers have examined consumer culture and brand communities in Western contexts (Coakley & Pike, 2021; Funk et al., 2022), and during the period of opening up (kai fang) there was considerable research on Western brands' penetrating into an increasing open Chinese market (Dong & Tian, 2009; Yu et al., 2017), little attention has been paid to how global sporting brands today must adapt to China's highly regulated digital spaces—where influencer-brand relationships are more explicitly commercialized and state-monitored than their Western counterparts. To address this gap, I employed critical discourse analysis (CDA) to examine how the Canadian sport apparel brand Lululemon navigates Chinese social media platforms. And I used wanghong influencers as 'brand embodiments' (Filo, Lock, & Karg, 2015; Skliar, & Cherrier, 2020), which localize identities of a global brand community (Mastromartino et al., 2020; Yoshida, Gordon, Heere, & James, 2015), to explore how the brand seeks to position itself as woven into the fabric of an increasingly insular everyday Chinese consumer culture. Focusing on its strategic positioning across the platform RedNote, I conducted a content analysis of over 500 videos, texts, and social media posts across the RedNote Platform. I also analyzed nearly 10,000 of related responses and user comments. My analysis of Lululemon's platform presence revealed four distinct strategies shaping brand community formation within Chinese digital spaces. First, the brand has developed a 'fitness with Chinese characteristics' marketing approach, adapting Western fitness concepts to align with Chinese cultural values. Second, Lululemon specifically targets 'super girls'—affluent, health-conscious, urban-dwelling women seeking premium athletic wear. Third, the brand promotes a new cosmopolitanism, defined by specialized knowledge of body aesthetics and exercise techniques that distinguish its community members as globally aware yet locally grounded. Fourth, Lululemon employs interactive and personalized salesmanship through the wanghong economy. The implementation of these strategies specifically in RedNote helps to foster distinctive approaches to body presentation, user interactivity, and aesthetic cultivation. This platform-specific variation in content creation highlights how the wanghong economy requires nuanced approaches that align with RedNote platform's endogenous characteristics. This research contributes to sport management literature by illuminating how Western sporting brands must navigate China's unique digital marketing landscape amid growing economic nationalism and state intervention in consumer markets. The findings have important implications for sport marketing practitioners and scholars: they demonstrate how success in the Chinese market requires understanding platform-specific community-building strategies, the distinctive nature of the wanghong economy, and the increasing challenge of competing with state-backed domestic brands. These insights are particularly valuable for sport organizations seeking to develop effective cross-cultural digital marketing strategies in an increasingly complex Chinese market environment characterized by technological sovereignty and consumer nationalism.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».