Documentary Aesthetics in the Long 1960s in Eastern Europe and Beyond by ClemensGünther and MatthiasSchwartz, eds. Studies in Slavic Literature and Poetics, Volume 67. Leiden: Brill, 2023. 330 pp. $139.00. ISBN 978‐90‐04‐53309‐7
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
During the 1960s, writers, filmmakers, and artists sought to replace compromised literary and artistic strategies with forms associated with authenticity, sincerity, and the authority of the witness.Documentary Aesthetics in the Long 1960s in Eastern Europe and Beyond presents a collection of thirteen essays examining various instances of documentary aesthetics in this period with an introduction written by the volume's editors, Clemens Günther and Matthias Schwartz.Contributors include emerging and established scholars from German, American, Swiss, Belgian, Russian, and Austrian universities.The introduction draws on Svetlana Alexievich's style of oral histories and testimonial literature to establish the collection's focus on documentary aesthetics in literature and films of the 1960s.Günther and Schwartz base their definition of documentary aesthetics on stylistic and discursive developments in post-Stalinist Soviet literature and literary discourse.The introduction next differentiates between documentary aesthetics in the 1960s and the earlier "literature of fact" and avant-garde literary theory from the 1920s.The volume's editors define the difference in terms of temporality: the earlier, avant-garde documentary approach focused on the present and the imagined future, whereas the documentary turn of the 1960s was part of a broader reexamination of the past.The introduction goes further and defines the international connections between Eastern European artists interested in documentary art and their contemporaries with similar interests in West Germany and the United States.Developing out of presentations at the international conference "'Firsthand Time.' Documentary Aesthetics in the Long 1960s," held at the Leibniz Center for Literary and Cultural Research in Berlin, January 16-18, 2020, seven of the thirteen chapters focus on literature, two on poetry, two on film, one on art, and one on theater; one chapter discusses both Alexander Kluge's films and literary texts.One of the key concepts discussed across several contributions to the volume refers to "ego-documents," a term developed by the Dutch historian Jacques Presser to define personal experiences and the perspective of historical actor-individuals in the form of self-narratives and self-testimonies.Günther and Schwartz organized the chapters into four thematically defined sections.The first group focuses on a selection of authors that utilized documentary strategies to investigate historical tragedies, featuring chapters by Franziska Thun-Hohenstein on the Soviet writer Varlam Shalamov, Natasha Gordinsky on the Soviet-Jewish author Aleksandra Brushtein, Tatjana Petzer on the Yugoslav-Jewish writer Danilo Kiš, and Gunther Martens on the German author and filmmaker Kluge.These authors present a range of formal and narrative strategies by combining fiction and nonfiction elements in literary texts such as Shalamov's Kolyma Tales (1954-early 1970s), Brushtein's autobiographical trilogy The Road Leads Off into the Distance (1955-59), Kiš's Early Sorrows (1969) and The Tomb of Boris Davidovich:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».