MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7116742607 · doi:10.1186/s12978-025-02225-5

“Now that they come to our doorsteps to teach us these things…” – Postpartum contraception outcomes from a pre-post effectiveness-implementation study of an integrated community health worker intervention in rural Nepal

2025· article· en· W7116742607 sur OpenAlexafffund
Nandini Choudhury, WU Wan-ju, Rekha Khatri, Aparna Tiwari, Aradhana Thapa, Samrachana Adhikari, Indira Basnett, Ved Bhandari, Aasha Bhatta, Bhawana Bogati, Laxman Datt Bhatt, David Citrin, Scott Halliday, Sonu Khadka, Yashoda Kumari Bhat Ksetri, Lal Bahadur Kunwar, Kshitiz Rana Magar, Nutan Marasini, Duncan Maru, Isha Nirola, Rashmi Paudel, Bala Rai, Ryan Schwarz, Sita Saud, Dikshya Sharma, Goma Devi Niraula, Ramesh Shrestha, Poshan Thapa, Hari Jung Rayamazi, Sheela Maru, Sabitri Sapkota

Notice bibliographique

RevueReproductive Health · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Organismes subventionnairesNational Institutes of HealthGrand Challenges CanadaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchSchool of Medicine, Boston UniversityUnited States Agency for International Development
Mots-clésReproductive medicinePublic healthIntervention (counseling)Community healthQualitative researchFamily planningPostpartum periodProgram evaluationPopulationChildbirth

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Postpartum contraceptive counseling and access are challenging in Nepal’s remote, hilly areas, driving a disproportionately high unmet need for contraception. Community health workers (CHWs) play an important role in delivering healthcare in difficult to reach places, but there is limited evidence from professionalized CHW models and their impact over time in Nepal. We implemented a pilot program in two rural districts in Nepal where full-time, salaried, and supervised CHWs delivered a bundled reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) intervention. This included contraceptive counseling adapted from the Balanced Counseling Strategy. Here we describe postpartum contraceptive outcomes associated with the integrated RMNCH intervention over a five-year period. Applying a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation approach, we conducted a non-randomized pre-post study with repeated measurements and nested qualitative data collection to study the intervention’s reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Compared to the pre-intervention period, we observed higher ward-level post-intervention postpartum contraceptive prevalence, stratified by early postpartum (RR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.96, 2.48) and late postpartum (RR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.50, 1.93), after adjusting for district and intervention site. Lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) was the most common method during early postpartum in most intervention sites. The proportion of women who switched to other effective methods after LAM was relatively low. Qualitative data indicated that CHWs’ longitudinal engagement with participants helped facilitate contraceptive counseling and uptake despite challenges such as participants’ fear of side effects, limited autonomy for women, and peer influence. Our findings suggest the integrated RMNCH intervention’s potential to increase modern contraceptive uptake in low-resource community settings and underscore CHWs’ ability to help drive longer-term change in their communities, especially around sensitive topics. This study contributes to the implementation research literature on community-based interventions to improve postpartum contraception use and may inform other CHW programs in similar contexts. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03371186, registered 04 December 2017, retrospectively registered. Women in Nepal’s remote, hilly areas often lack access to contraceptive counseling despite not wanting another pregnancy soon after giving birth. Community health workers (CHWs) play a key role in delivering healthcare in difficult to reach places. We tested out a program in two rural districts in Nepal where CHWs visited women in their homes to offer reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) care. The program included counseling individuals on contraception based on their family planning needs and values. We studied how modern contraception use changed in the area after this RMNCH program was introduced, compared to before. We found that, on average, the proportion of women who used a modern method of contraception increased in the local areas where CHWs visited women to provide RMNCH care. We also learned through conversations with CHWs, others involved in the program, and those who received care from CHWs, that CHWs’ regular visits helped them build relationships within their community, which likely helped women feel more comfortable being counseled and choose contraceptive methods. Women in the community hesitated to use modern contraceptives because they were afraid of side effects, were often unable to make decisions for themselves without their partners or families’ approval, or because the contraceptives they wanted were not available. We found that CHWs can help drive longer-term change in their communities, especially around sensitive topics like contraception.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,027

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,405
Écart entre enseignants0,377 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReproductive HealthMême sujetGlobal Maternal and Child HealthTravaux en français237 207