ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS: ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL ANDINTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article provides a comprehensive analytical review of contemporary approaches to energy-efficient residential building design, comparing practices in Ukraine with those established in Western countries. The study examines the regulatory and legal framework that governs the design, construction, and certification of buildings according to energy efficiency criteria, highlighting the evolution of standards and their impact on the construction industry. A detailed comparison is conducted between Ukrainian building codes (DBNs) and state standards (DSTUs) and their European, American, and Canadian counterparts, including the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD), ISO 52000 series, ASHRAE 90.1, and the National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings (NECB). This comparative analysis reveals significant disparities in methodology, calculation procedures, and minimum energy performance requirements. The research demonstrates that Western standards incorporate more comprehensive approaches to lifecycle assessment, renewable energy integration, and occupant behavior modeling, while Ukrainian regulations are gradually transitioning toward these advanced methodologies. Based on the practical example of the Lofthouse cottage in the Netherlands, the article illustrates a technological model of an energy-efficient building that exemplifies Nearly Zero Energy Building (NZEB) principles. The study explores critical design considerations including optimal building orientation for passive solar gain, advanced structural solutions for foundations that minimize thermal bridging, high-performance wall assemblies with enhanced insulation values, innovative roof systems that integrate renewable energy generation, high-efficiency windows with low U-values, and sophisticated mechanical ventilation systems with heat recovery capabilities. The article systematically identifies the principal differences between Ukrainian and Western design models, focusing on aspects such as energy modeling requirements, thermal performance standards, air tightness specifications, and renewable energy obligations. These differences represent both challenges and opportunities for the Ukrainian construction sector as it seeks to align with European Union energy efficiency directives. Based on this analysis, the research formulates practical recommendations for harmonizing Ukraine's regulatory framework with international best practices and accelerating the implementation of NZEB technologies in Ukrainian residential construction. The recommendations address policy development, professional training, technology transfer mechanisms, and financial incentive structures. The results demonstrate that the adoption of modern energy-efficient technologies and design principles can reduce energy consumption in Ukrainian residential buildings by 40-60% compared to conventional construction methods. Furthermore, economic analysis indicates that despite higher initial capital costs, these investments achieve financial viability with payback periods of 10-12 years, considering current energy prices and available subsidy programs. These findings underscore the significant potential for improving Ukraine's building stock performance while reducing environmental impact and enhancing energy security.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle