Does Severe Tibiotalar Malalignment Predispose to Worse Midterm Outcomes following TAA?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research Type: Level 4 – Case series Introduction/Purpose: Previous studies have suggested that modern total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) implants may be used in the setting of severe tibiotalar malalignment, however midterm results are limited. The Zimmer Trabecular Metal TAA is unique in that it utilizes a lateral transfibular approach and an external fixator, which may aid in deformity correction. The aim of this study is to compare midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with severe varus or valgus tibiotalar deformity treated with primary transfibular TAA at a minimum of 5-years follow-up. Methods: Retrospective review was performed on prospectively followed patients who underwent primary transfibular TAA by a single surgeon from October 2012 to January 2020. Inclusion criteria included: minimum 5-years of follow-up, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROM), and radiographs. A total of 210 cases were grouped into Neutral (n=141), Varus (n=36), and Valgus (n=33) based on preoperative coronal talar tilt angle (0±5°, ≤-10°, ≥10°, respectively). ANOVA tests were utilized to compare minimum 5-year PROMs between the 3 groups: 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scores, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (OAS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Final postoperative radiographs were assessed for recurrence of deformity. Adverse events and reoperations were reported using the Canadian Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) Reoperation Coding System (CROCS). Results: There were no significant differences between groups in baseline demographics, length of follow-up, or postoperative PROMs. Average preoperative talar tilt was -15.8° (range, -23.7 to -10.0°) in the Varus group, and 16.2° (10.0 to 25.3°) in the Valgus group. In the Varus group, 1 case had recurrent varus deformity, and 2 cases progressed to valgus deformity. One case in the Valgus group had recurrent valgus deformity. A total of 9 ankles had periprosthetic cysts with equal distribution between the three groups. Overall reoperation rates were similar (Neutral, 34.0%; Varus, 33.3%; Valgus, 36.4%), however there were fewer incidences of medial gutter debridement (CROCS code 4) in the Varus and Valgus groups compared to the Neutral group. Conclusion: Preoperative coronal tibiotalar malalignment may not be a contraindication to transfibular TAA in the primary treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. Patients with severe varus or valgus ankle deformity of 10 degrees or more demonstrated similar postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes at midterm follow-up, without an increased risk for reoperations. Nevertheless, TAA in severe deformity should be performed by experienced surgeons. Patient baseline demographics, postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures, and adverse events stratified by preoperative tibiotalar deformity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».