Genetically Encoded Design and Biomanufacturing of Mechanical Protein Materials
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Conspectus Natural protein materials such as spider silks, fibroins, and mussel foot proteins epitomize the pinnacle of mechanical performance in biological matter. Their unparalleled strength-to-weight ratios, inherent biocompatibility, and precise programmability at the amino acid level make them ideal blueprints for next-generation structural biomaterials. However, these advantages are counterbalanced by inherent limitations: scarce natural availability, limited functional diversity in native sequences, and challenges in scalable processing and reproduction. Recent advances in gene editing and synthetic biology have enabled the de novo design of artificial mechanical proteins, bypassing these constraints. By modularly integrating mechanical, metal-coordinating (e.g., LanM and amyloid motifs), and bioactive domains (e.g., antifreeze and epidermal growth factor modules) from phylogenetically diverse species, researchers now exert unprecedented control over the protein sequence, hierarchical architecture, and macroscopic behavior. These engineered variants have already led to advanced biomedical products, including surgical sutures, hernia meshes, and hemostatic sealants, that outperform conventional synthetic polymers in both functionality and biocompatibility. Nonetheless, scalable biomanufacturing remains hindered by the structural features that underpin mechanical superiority: highly repetitive motifs and high molecular weights often promote aggregation, proteolytic instability, and low recombinant yields in conventional expression systems. To overcome these bottlenecks, extensive efforts have focused on optimizing chassis cells, such as E. coli and C. glutamicum, through glycyl-tRNA enrichment, CRISPRi-enabled secretion screening, codon scrambling, and signal peptide engineering. Moreover, the fidelity of supramolecular assembly critically determines the ultimate performance of the material, necessitating precise control over the processing conditions. This Account provides a critical review of recent advances in modular protein strategies for fabricating high-performance biomaterials, organized around three synergistic pillars: (i) rational modular design, which combines rigid β-sheet domains (e.g., SRT or spidroins), flexible linkers (e.g., ELP or resilin), metal-binding motifs, and functional peptides to orthogonally tailor strength, toughness, and bioactivity; (ii) chassis cell optimization through transcriptional, translational, and post-translational engineering to enhance the synthesis and secretion of repetitive proteins; and (iii) biomimetic assembly techniques, such as microfluidic spinning and liquid–liquid phase separation, enabling the precise alignment of β-sheet nanocrystals and multiforce-directed cross-linking into hierarchical fibers and glues with toughness exceeding 200 MJ/m 3 and adhesive strength over 30 MPa. Looking forward, we advocate for the integration of these experimental approaches with AI-driven design loops that combine de novo sequence generation, mechanical property prediction, and automated process optimization. Such closed-loop, data-driven frameworks promise to drastically compress development timelines, improve production yields, and enable scalable, sustainable manufacturing of protein materials tailored for cutting-edge applications in biomedicine, soft robotics, and sustainable materials.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».