Rediscovering Migration and Cultural Interaction in the ‘Old World’: Canadian Research Approaches Reach Europe
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The insertion of the memory of migration into Canadian history and the rediscovery of intra-European migrations in both statewide and pan-European versions of history have followed peculiar trajectories. The ‘country of immigration’- trope has, of course, always been present in Canadian public discourse, politics and historiography. However, in a state in which every person was equal before the law, not only did two rather than one particularly large ethnic groups claim special consideration as ‘nation’ (or ‘founding nation’); also, immigrants could not join either of the ‘nations’ but were slotted as ‘ethnics.’ In Europe, the migrations of Teutons and Saxons were recorded; so were the German-language (not: ‘German’) eastward migrations, as well as emigration; but thereafter – according to the master narrative – peoples had been sedentary for centuries. As long as these views prevailed, there was little ‘Europe’ might learn from ‘Canada’ – referring to the cultural-societal structures and practices that came into being only from the 1960s (Canada) or later (Europe). Of the two competing cultural elites one – or at least its Ontario and Maritimes section – was mentally focussed on Great Britain to the 1950s. The English-, Scottish-, and Irish-origin inhabitants in the West were somewhat skeptical of this colony-style transatlantic mental dependency. And many inhabitants of British Columbia, in fact, looked across the Pacific. The other elite, Quebec’s spokespersons (spokes men would still be an empirically correct designation), was, to some degree, as enamored with France though this relationship was complex. The clerical segment of the francophones had constructed Quebec as a new, true France after what they considered the deviousness, un-Frenchness of the Commune, industrialization, and urbanization. It is a highly problematic aspect of our languages (‘mother tongues’) that names, ‘Canada’ and ‘Europe’ in our case, apply indiscriminately to very different societal formations and to shifting geographies. Temporal, historical, change is not reflected in the words we use; neither are changing institutional settings or geographical contraction and expansion. We would need proc essual concepts, ‘scapes’ (Appadurai, Roberts), and meanings. (But this issue would merit a paper of its own.) These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,012 | 0,022 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,048 | 0,025 |
| Communication savante | 0,019 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».