MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7118530633 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18157296

Illidops doreenae Hocherl & Fernandez-Triana 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· W7118530633 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Amelie Höcherl, M. O. Kaliuzhna, Michael J. Raupach, José Fernández-Triana

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Établissements canadiensCNIB Foundation
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeParatypeNearctic ecozoneKey (lock)Margin (machine learning)Table (database)ScapeEtymology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Illidops doreenae Höcherl & Fernandez-Triana sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 3A46EE66-F7E9-46B2-A124-930CD72C1DB0 Figs 2F, 18–21; Table 3 Diagnosis This species resembles I. urgo and I. urgens in the lighter coloration of the clypeus and smooth propodeum. It differs in its elongate glossa, the eyes barely converging towards the lower margin of the face, clypeus light brown, and scape and pedicel dark brown to black. It also resembles I. kostylevi based on the smooth propodeum and r1 longer than 0.5 of the pterostigma length. The new species differs in the following characters: clypeus coloration light and contrasting with the remaining face, glossa rather elongate, T2 shiny and with straight margin (compared to slightly sculptured with a sinuate margin in I. kostylevi), and smooth band posterior to the mesoscutellar disc invaded anteriorly by punctures (compared to much stronger sculpture in I. kostylevi). The species can readily be distinguished from the other Nearctic species (I. scutellaris and I. terrestris) by its entirely smooth propodeum. Etymology This species is named to honour Doreen Watler, who has supported not only AH, but also countless other visiting students and researchers over the past> 20 years during research stays at the CNC. By this, she has contributed significantly to advancements in entomology, and specifically in microgastrine taxonomy. We are very grateful to her. Type material Holotype CANADA – Yukon Territory • ♀; Champagne; 60.790° N, 136.437° W; 733 m a.s.l.; 8 Jul. 2006; H. Goulet and C. Boudreault leg.; sweeping; plants along road; CNC, HYM00000599. Paratypes CANADA – Yukon Territory • 6 ♀♀; same data as for holotype; CNC, HYM00000583, HYM00000584, HYM00000587, HYM00000599, HYM00000628, HYM00000629 • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; SNSB-ZSM, HYM00000579 • 3 ♀♀; same data as for holotype; 10 Jul. 2006; CNC, HYM00001685, HYM00001693, HYM00001696. Other material examined CANADA – Alberta • 1 ♀; Saskatoon Mountains, Beaverlodge vicinity, natural meadow; 55.22005° N, 119.282° W; 962 m a.s.l.; 27 Jul. 2007; J. Otani leg.; sweeping; natural meadow; CNC, MIC 000696. – Ontario • 1 ♀; Leeds and Grenville, Elizabethtown-Kitley, 4452 Rowsome Rd., Elizabethtown; 44.621° N, 75.773° E; 112 m a.s.l.; 7 Sep. 2010; James Sones leg.; Malaise Trap; CNC, BIOUG01284 - D11 • 2 ♀♀; Toronto, Rouge National Urban Park, Sector 10; 43.8157° N, 79.207° E; 151 m a.s.l.; 15 Sep. 2013; BIO Team leg.; Pan traps; CNC, BIOUG08036-D11, BIOUG08036-F09. – Yukon Territory • 5 ♀♀; same data as for holotype; 10 Jul. 2006; CNC, HYM00001722, HYM00001688, HYM00001691, HYM00001692, HYM00001724. Description Female MEASUREMENTS. Body length: 2.8 (2.95) mm. Fore wing length: 2.5 (2.45) mm. Antenna shorter than body. HEAD. Face: eyes very slightly converging below, inner margin of eyes almost straight. Minimum face width/maximum face width: 0.94 (0.93). Malar distance/mandible width: 0.85 (0.73). Face densely punctate, punctures on lower half of the face elongate through fusion with adjacent ones, appearing to form striae on lower half of face. Ocelli in high triangle, posterior tangent to anterior ocellus not touching posterior pair. OOL/POD: 2.64 (2.50). POL/POD: 2.50 (2.13). F2 length/width: 2.78 (2.78). F15 length/ width: 1.16 (1.22). F2 length/F15 length: 2.27 (2.27). MESOSOMA. Anteromesoscutum with: dense shallow punctures. Mesoscutellar disc punctate. Posterior bar of mesoscutellum polished, median area with some punctures anteriorly. Propodeum entirely polished with some small rugosities radiating posterior centrally from nucha. METASOMA. T1 shape: anterior 0.6 almost parallel-sided, narrowing in posterior 0.4. T1 sculpture: anterior 0.6 and posterior tip polished, band of weak sculpture and setosity at posterior 0.1–0.3. T1 width (anterior, maximum, posterior): 0.22, 0.24, 0.17 (0.19, 0.21, 0.17) mm. T1 central length/ posterior width: 2.00 (1.75). T2 trapezoideal, very short, posterior margin sinuate. T2 polished or very lightly sculptured, shiny. T2 width at posterior margin/central length: 3.0 (3.40). Posterior margin of T3–T7 slightly desclerotized but mediotergites not appearing to be pushed forward. Hypopygium not enlarged, its posterior end about in line with end of apical tergites. Ventral margin of hypopygium with desclerotized area showing several pleats. Ovipositor sheaths broad and setose over most of their length. Ovipositor distinctly downcurved at apical 0.3. Ovipositor sheaths length/metatibial length: 0.81 (0.95). Metafemur length/width: 0.33 (0.30). Tarsal claws: simple. WINGS. Length of fore wing veins r/2 RS: 1.86 (1.28). Pterostigma length/width: 2.05 (2.38). Point of insertion of vein r in pterostigma: clearly beyond half length of pterostigma. Angle of vein r with fore wing anterior margin: slightly outwards, inclined towards fore wing apex. Length of vein R1/distance of distal end of R1 to distal end of vein 3 RS: 1.64 (1.80). COLORATION. Body color: mostly dark brown to black, some specimens (including some males and a female paratype) show a broad stripe of lighter coloration lateroventrally on mesosoma (see Fig. 21G). Head color: head including face dark brown to black, clypeus and labrum contrasting lighter brown, palpi pale except for slightly darker base. Antenna completely dark brown to black. Legs: all coxae brown to black. Femora: pro- and mesofemur with paler coloration apically, metafemur entirely dark brown. Tibiae varying between specimens: protibia from yellow to light brown (holotype); mesotibia lighter basally, darker brown apically; metatibia completely brown (holotype, paratype: metatibia yellow on basal 0.7, darker apically). Tarsi brown. Tegula and humeral complex dark brown to black. Fore wing: pterostigma brown, some specimens with slightly lighter area at basal 0.1, wing veins in basal third brown (YT, type series), transparent (variation A), or a combination of brown and transparent (variation B). Male Unknown. Biology/ ecology Host unknown. Distribution NEA: Canada (AB, BC, NB, ON, YT), USA (AK). Molecular data Molecular data: BOLD:AAB5165 and BOLD:ACL9543, details in Table 3 and Fig. 18. Remarks We found molecular and morphological variation within this species; however, we interpret the differences in DNA barcodes and morphology as rather minor and inconsistent with distribution. The species is represented in two BINs, BOLD:AAB5165 and BOLD:ACL9543. The maximum pairwise distance within the species (including both BINs) is 3.27%. Variation A is represented by two specimens from the same BIN as the holotype (BOLD:AAB5165) but the specimens were collected farther south in Canada (AB, ON). They differ from the Yukon specimens by having the veins in the basal third of the fore wing transparent except for the anterior margin of the wing (C+SC+R). Variation B clusters in BIN BOLD:ACL9543 and mainly differs by the specimens being much smaller than the type series and variation A. For now, we consider all three to be part of the same species. However, we excluded the two variations from the type series as they may in the future prove to represent separate species. This species challenges our concept of Illidops, because it also partially fits the concept of Dolichogenidea. Based on the sculptured area interrupting the posterior smooth band of the scutellum centrally (which in this case consists of punctures), the short R1, and the COI sequences which match most closely other sequences associated with Illidops, we place it in Illidops for now. There are no morphologically similar species of Dolichogenidea found in the Nearctic.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,753
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,001
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0770,016

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,241
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlTravaux en français237 207