Illidops vitobiasi Kotenko 2004
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Illidops vitobiasi Kotenko, 2004 Fig. 61 Illidops vitobiasi Kotenko, 2004: 119, figs 1–6. Type material Holotype TURKMENISTAN – [Lebap Region] • ♀; Repetek [Repetek Biosphere State Reserve?]; [38.61° N, 63.21° E]; sands; 27 Apr. 1992; A. Kotenko leg.; SIZK. Species concept Our species concept is based on our examination of photos of the holotype and the information available in Kotenko (2004, 2007) → ***. Ecology / host information Host unknown. Distribution PAL: Turkmenistan. Molecular data No molecular data available. Remarks In addition to the holotype, there are 5 female and 2 male paratypes stored at SIZK (Zerova et al. 2006). Original description sensu Kotenko (2004) (translated from Russian and with updated morphological terminology and comments in brackets when our observations did not match Kotenko’s) Diagnosis. The new species is most similar to Illidops electilis, but differs from it by eyes more strongly converging downwards, usually more articulated sculpture of the propodeum, short and wide T1 and shorter ovipositor sheaths. Description. Female. Body length 2.3 mm. Width of head almost 2 × its length [in dorsal view head width versus head length], slightly wider than width of mesonotum; head behind eyes comparatively sharply roundly narrowed [in dorsal view head behind eyes comparatively narrow]. The occiput is rather strongly concave. Ocelli arranged in a strongly obtuse triangle [ocelli in high triangle]; tangent to the anterior margin of the posterior ocelli passing along the posterior margin of the anterior ocellus [imaginary tangent posterior to the anterior ocellus does not touch or cross the posterior ocelli]; POL distinctly greater than OD. Eyes noticeably converging downwards, their transverse diameter 1.6× less than longitudinal diameter, and almost 2.0 × longer than length of gena (laterally). Face with longitudinal median elevation, which is more distinct before frons. Height of the face with the clypeus approximately equal to its width at its lower part. Clypeus well separated, shortened, with dense setae, almost straight along the front margin. Antennae shorter than the body; length of F15 1.5× as long as its width. Mesosoma slightly shorter than metasoma, its length 1.3× its height. Fore wing length 1.3 × hind wing length, approximately equal in length to the body; length of pterostigma 2.3× its width; vein R1 shorter than pterostigma length and noticeably shorter than the distance from the apex of the R1 to the apex of the wing; vein 1cu arising around the middle of the 1st discal cell; hind wing vein cu-a almost straight. Metatibiae slightly shorter than metatarsi; inner spur of metatibia not longer than outer, distinctly shorter than half of basitarsus; Ratio of metatarsomere lengths as follows 4.4: 2.1: 1.4: 1.0: 1.3. T1 short and wide, its length 1.2× its maximum width; T2 large and wide. Ovipositor sheaths relatively short, their visible part barely longer than half length of metatibia. Face, gena, and head dorsally with shallow sculpture, slightly shiny; occiput densely wrinkly-sculptured, matte. Mesoscutum and scutellum densely punctured, with slight satin shine, almost matte. Propodeum along anterior margin and in postero-lateral corners sculptured, matte, in middle part with smoothed sculpture and more or less shiny; propodeum often softly sculpted and matte. T1 and T2 equally densely sculptured, matte. Body black; antennae and palps reddish-brown or brown; tegulae and legs (except mostly black metacoxa) yellowish-brown or brown; metatibial spurs whitish; wings very faintly yellowish; pterostigma light brown, usually in the basal half and along the anterior margin lighter; vein R1 and veins in the middle part of the fore wing light brown or brownish-yellow. Male. It differs from female by longer (longer than body) antennae and darker coloration of legs (metafemur, apical half of middle and metatibiae, and metatarsus darkened). Material. Holotype: ♀, Turkmenistan, Repetek, sands, 27 IV 1992 (A. Kotenko). Paratypes. Turkmenistan: 5 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂, labeled as in the holotype; 1 ♀, Repetek, ridge sands, white saxaul, ephedra, 9 IV 1993 (V. Perepechaenko).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».