MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7119369724

Editorial

2014· article· pt· W7119369724 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marilyn Conibear

Notice bibliographique

RevueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2014
Typearticle
Languept
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMeaning (existential)Occupational therapyWork (physics)Professional developmentWork experienceContinuing professional development
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

When I was asked if I would write an editorial about professional journals and databases, I went to the dictionary to look up the exact meaning of ‘editorial’. It means a writing of opinions based on a topic. As I have 52 years of occupational therapy experience as a clinician, an educator and developer of OTDBASE, I have opinions based on my experience.The development of OTDBASE came from my own experience and needs. Initially, as a student, I learned from my teachers’ lectures and medical textbooks, with rare references to our professional journal, the Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy (CJOT). While working in a relatively isolated area of western Canada, I managed to have access to both CJOT and the American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT), at that time consideredto be the ‘best’ occupational therapy journal. Ten years later, while doing graduate work at the University of British Columbia, I spent hundreds of hours researching the history of the development of occupational therapy in Canada. Because this was the pre‑computer and pre‑database era, those hours were spent looking for information that no one could tell me if it even existed.I began teaching occupational therapy in 1971, and was very aware that students still had to spend hundreds of hours in the library looking for information they hoped existed. In the 1970’s, personal computers became available to libraries and individuals. By the time I had my third personal computer and learned a little about what a database was, it occurred to me that perhaps this machine and I could create a special database program which could shorten the time needed to find wanted occupational therapy journal articles.Rather than ‘re‑inventing the wheel’, I consulted with the university librarian to see what databases already existed that contained occupational therapy journals. We lookedfor 8 of the most available occupational therapy journals and found them in 42 different databases, but there was no one database that contained all 8 journals. I felt then thatthe creation of a database containing only occupational therapy journals would fill a need, not only for clinicians and educators, but especially for students who could findout quickly if there were (or, even more importantly, were not) journal articles available on any occupational therapy topic.The creation of OTDBASE in 1986 required me to type in thousands of abstracts as scanners were in their preliminary stage of development. The development of personal computer scanners in the early ‘90s made it easier to increase the number of journals and their abstracts in OTDBASE.Occupational therapy journals play a vital role in the development of our profession. They reflect the interests of a community, allow communication within that community,stimulate new thinking, challenge practice and advance professional knowledge. Reading journals for inclusion in OTDBASE, especially relatively new journals from newly developing occupational therapy countries, tended to show me that there was a certain anxiety about creating what is felt to be a new profession. On the other hand, journals from countries with well‑developed occupational therapy professions show a gradual development over the years from communication and descriptive content to the development of theory, research and practice.Because I was in contact with a number of countries with newly developing occupational therapy profession, I wondered, if asked, which existing journals I could recommend as being most helpful to their professional development. I could only answer that question if I examined which occupational therapy journals were most referenced in other occupational therapy journals. My 2006 and 2007 personal research findings that the three journals most referenced by others, and thus in my opinion professionally valued, were the American Journal of Occupational Therapy, the Occupational Therapy Journal of Research: Occupation, Participation and Health, and the Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. These finding were not a great surprise to me as the United States and Canada had the longest history of the development of theory, models of practice and research related to the development of occupational therapy as a profession.Forty years ago, long before I was asked to provide an editorial opinion piece for the Cadernos de Terapia Ocupacional da UFSCar, from Brazil, I express my opinion on the necessity of encouraging continuing education if our profession was ever to grow and develop as an independent and valued profession. Over the many years since then it has become very evident to me that professional journals are one of the major keystones to that continuing education and professional development.Marilyn ConibearAssociate Professor, Occupational Therapy, The University of Western Ontario,1971-1990Professor Emeritus, Occupational Therapy, The University of Western OntarioDeveloper and owner, OTDBASE, 1985 to the present

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,291
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,000

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,057
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0050,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0110,005
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2910,184

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,345
Écart entre enseignants0,298 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Même sujetOccupational Therapy Practice and Research→Travaux en français237 207→