Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Subfamily Amorphicolinae Burckhardt, Ouvrard & Percy, 2021 Comment. Burckhardt et al. (2021) erected a new subfamily, Amorphicolinae, for the genus Amorphicola based on the clade grouping and phylogenetic topology of the mitogenome analyses of Percy et al. (2018). The new genus described here was also included in the phylogenetic analyses of Percy et al. (2018), but the genus was not described at the time of the revised classification and the definition of subfamily Amorphicolinae was based solely on Amorphicola. Here, the subfamily definition is broadened to reflect characteristics of both genera in Amorphicolinae, as follows: Adult. Amorphicola and Danieliana share head characteristics as described in Burckhardt et al. (2021) except the antenna length which is 1–1.5x head width in Amorphicola and longer, 1.5–1.6x head width, in Danieliana; in addition, there are differences in the relative lengths of the antennal segments which are either with segment 3 longer than segments 7 or 8 (in Amorphicola) or segment 3 shorter than segment 7, and segments 4–6 and 8 subequal (in Danieliana). Thorax and leg characters are as described in Burckhardt et al. (2021), except metatibia is either without (in Amorphicola) or with a small genual spine (in Danieliana), and metatibia apex either bearing 4 irregularly spaced, sclerotised, apical spurs (in Amorphicola) or 5 grouped (1+3+1) sclerotised apical spurs (in Danieliana). Forewing and hindwing as described in Burckhardt et al. (2021). Male proctiger as described in Burckhardt et al. (2021); paramere complex, in profile either axe or hammer-shaped with several sclerotised peg setae on the inner face (in Amorphicola) or long and sinuous with many long, extended setae on the inner face (in Danieliana). Fifth instar immature. As described in Burckhardt et al. (2021). Systematics. The majority of adult and all immature characteristics for Amorphicolinae given in Burckhardt et al. (2021) are shared by Amorphicola and Danieliana. The main shared characteristics are in the general structure of the adult head, thorax, legs, male proctiger, and elongate male subgenital plate, and in the immature structure and chaetotaxy. The main differences between the genera being antenna length, relative lengths of antennal segments, size of forewing cells cu 1 and m 1, presence/absence of a genual spine on metatibia and number of sclerotised apical metatibial spurs, and the shape of the paramere. Some of the morphological characters of Danieliana that differentiate it from Amorphicola, suggest an affiliation with Ciriacreminae Enderlein, 1910 (see comment under generic description below), particularly the genus Isogonoceraia Tuthill, 1964, which includes two species in South America (White & Hodkinson 1980; Burckhardt & Queiroz 2012) and one in Micronesia (Tuthill 1964). Isogonoceraia is also the only member of Ciriacreminae known to have caesalpinoid legume (referring to Caesalpinieae and Cassieae clades of Fabaceae) host plants (Ouvrard 2022), which is the same host plant group as Danieliana. Characteristics shared between some members of Amorphicolinae and Ciriacreminae may reflect shared ancestry (e.g., in the root of subfamilies Amorphicolinae, Ciriacreminae and Psyllinae Latreille, 1807), as the two subfamilies are phylogenetically close, or they may be homoplasious and converged in the two groups. Adult key to genera (and tribes) of subfamily Amorphicolinae 1 Forewing with relatively low and wide cell cu 1 and low cell m 1 (ratios CUR>1.5; MR>0.6); antenna about as long as or slightly longer than head width (1–1.5x), segment 3 longer than segment 7; genae extremely short and directed downward; base of metatibia without genual spine; paramere, in lateral profile, axe or hammer-shaped; proximal aedeagus segment not inflated distally; host plant genus Amorpha ...................... Amorphicola (tribe Amorphicolini trib. nov.), North America 2 Forewing with relatively high and narrow cell cu 1 and high cell m 1 (ratios CUR <1.5; MR <0.6); antenna length equal to or more than 1.5x head width (1.5–1.6x) (Fig. 1I), segment 3 shorter than segment 7 (Fig. 1J); genae moderately short and directed upward (Fig. 1H); base of metatibia with small genual spine (Fig. 1K); paramere, in lateral profile, long and slender (Figs. 2A, 2B); proximal aedeagus segment inflated distally (Figs. 2A, 2D); host plant genus Caesalpinia ............................................................................. Danieliana gen. nov. (tribe Danielianini trib. nov.), Taiwan
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,082 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».