Brazilian protocol to the certification of Cities in the Global Network of Cities and Communities Friendly to the Elderly of the World Health Organization (WHO)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Population aging is a progressive phenomenon, especially in developing countries. Given this scenario, international organizations have drawn attention to the advancement of aging worldwide. For this, these organizations have promoted fundamental actions encouraging the creation of friendly environments for the elderly, among these actions, the Age-friendly cities and communities and the Global Network for Age-friendly Cities and Communities stand out. In 2022 there were 1,445 cities included in the Global Network of the World Health Organization, of these, 849 cities are located in the Americas, among which 31 are Brazilian. For the certification of cities in the aforementioned Network, it is necessary to meet several criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO), through recommended protocols. However, with the experience acquired in monitoring the certification of twenty-three cities in Paraná, it was possible to perceive the lack of a national protocol in Brazil, since the certification process that took place in Brazilian cities was supported by international protocols. Due to this scenario, the problem of this thesis originated, namely: Brazilian experiences, based on international protocols and adapted to the national context, could support the creation of a Brazilian protocol for the certification process of cities or towns in the Global Cities and Communities Network WHO Age-friendly? And what would your contributions be? With the general objective of proposing a Brazilian Protocol model for the process of certification of cities and communities in the WHO Global Network for Age-friendly Cities and Communities, based on Brazilian experiences, contributing to facilitate the process, as well as helping managers, municipal planners, researchers and civil society regarding the expansion of friendly environments for the elderly and other ages. The methodology chosen, considering the characteristics of the study, was the qualitative approach, consisting of bibliographical and documentary research, participant research and semi-structured interviews. Regarding to the interviewees, six researchers who participated in the certification of eighteen Brazilian cities were interviewed, along with the WHO Global Network for age-friendly Cities and Communities. In this sense, the results showed that the certification protocols used are based on documents, such as: Vancouver Protocol (WHO, 2006), Global Guide for Age-Friendly Cities (WHO, 2007) and WHO Global Network of Cities and Age-Friendly Communities (WHO, 2010). The awareness stage, listening to the elderly population, as well as the construction of the Municipal Action Plan for the Elderly, were fundamental in the process of certification of Brazilian cities. Contributions from Brazilian experiences supported the creation of a Brazilian protocol model for the certification process of cities in the WHO Global Network for age-friendly Cities and Communities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».