Active methodologies: reflections on te path between tradition and innovation
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Faced with a scenario of changes in various social segments, the educational field also needs to adapt to the new times, since education is organized and formatted to meet the demands of society, but it is a very complex task. One of the points that require attention concerns the relationship between those involved in the teaching and learning process. The purpose of this work is to reflect on the literature and teaching practice on such methodologies. As guides, we propose the following questions: What are active methodologies? Since when and where does the search for student autonomy in education come from? Are we teachers, in fact, prepared for the proposed changes with the use of active methodologies? Active methodologies have potential, but what is the vision regarding their use in a neoliberal education? Therefore, our objective is to understand and propose reflections, from the teaching point of view, about active methodologies, the attempt to implement them in our classroom practices in basic education, in addition bringing the discussion about the neoliberal aspects that use the innovation discourse to promote these methodologies as products to be sold. As a theoretical background, we will bring some authors such as Bacich, Neto and Trevisani (2015), Mello, Neto and Petrillo (2019) with the concept and characteristics of active methodologies; Dewey (2011) and Freire (1993 and 1996) with discussions on building autonomy; Libâneo (2013) and Nunes (2008) about the position and challenge of teachers in the face of innovations; Laval (2019), Mordente (2020), Borges (2020) and Silveira (2009) with the reading of the neoliberal forces active in Brazilian Education. The educational product during the Professional Master's in Teaching in Basic Education of the Stricto Sensu Graduate Program CEPAE / UFG is available on the website entitled: “Active methodologies: reflections” https://www.metodologiasativasreflexoes.com/, of an expository nature, it has a blog part that has posts resulting from the bibliographical survey and curation of materials on the subject, the forum with reflective questions about active methodologies and teaching practice and sharing activities in Spanish and Portuguese Language. The intention is to reach basic education teachers who share the anxieties related to the use of active methodologies, so that there is a space for conceptual clarification and an invitation to reflect on the teaching praxis, those involved and the teaching and learning process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle