A racionalidade neoliberal regula as políticas educacionais: o empreendedorismo no referencial curricular gaúcho
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation is linked to the field of Educational Policies and was written during the studies at PPGEDU/UPF; it was led by a study of a basic nature, for the purpose of contributing to research focused on curricular policies. The general goal aimed to understand how neoliberal rationality regulates educational policy manifested in the Gaúcho Curricular Reference for High School. The specific goals focused on (i) analyzing the curricular documents guiding the High School Reform, identifying, through a critical diagnosis, the changes and emerging concepts that began to structure the high school curriculum; (ii) identify and understand how neoliberal rationality materializes in the Gaúcho Curriculum Reference for High School (GCR), pointing out the possible consequences of this educational model for the training of students; (iii) contribute, through this investigative process, with political, theoretical, pedagogical and epistemological arguments, so that the school faces the determinism of neoliberal rationality that demarcates the GCR from the HS. The research problem aimed to answer the following question: Considering the context of Law 13,415/2017, how does neoliberal rationality regulate the educational policy manifested in the Gaúcho Curriculum Reference for High School? The hypothesis was adopted that investigating the entrepreneurial rationality that regulates educational policies, especially in the GCR, is necessary to raise awareness and create resistance strategies in the face of the political, economic and social situation that the school faces. As for the research methodology, it was based in the analytical-hermeneutic method, as its purpose was to interpret, understand and point out how neoliberal rationality spreads through entrepreneurship, disseminating training strategies for economic power in the educational area. Regarding the approach to the problem, it is a qualitative research as it seeks the interpretation and analysis of categories, texts and documents. In relation to its goals, it is characterized as descriptive-analytical and, in terms of procedures, as a bibliographic and documentary research, as it searches the literature for the theoretical foundation to analyze an educational policy document through the content analysis of the Gaúcho Curriculum Reference. To achieve the purpose of the investigation, the bibliographical sources of the research (Dardot; Laval, 2016; Laval, 2004; Campos; Soeiro, 2016; Mazzucato, 2014) were essentials works to think about the concept of entrepreneurship as a neoliberal rationality and as a model educational. The main documentary source was the Gaúcho Curricular Reference (2021), preceded by laws, guidelines, ordinances and references that standardize the curricular policies in force as of 2013. Commentators who dialogue about the topic debated through articles were also included in the study. published in periodicals and book chapters, as well as in recent publications relating to High School Reform. Among the conclusions of the text, it is drawn that neoliberal rationality, having conceived the concept of entrepreneurship as a way of being and conceiving life, employs the values of education and teaching solely for the training of professionals aimed at the job market . For this reason, educating for entrepreneurship, or disseminating entrepreneurial culture, also means motivating students to take individual initiative in search of their own survival. Given the problematization raised, it is concluded that training for entrepreneurship, as stated in the GCR-HS, induces education in high school for the training of 10 emerging labor, in order to crystallize social inequality, the deregulation of public policies and the detriment of the emancipatory formation of citizens. Although the implementation of the New High School is already taking place, this work found that educational projects are designed almost without the participation of teachers and students; this study demonstrates that the true goals of the changes are distant from the context and concrete problems that the educational reality faces
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,019 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».