The handmaid's tale à luz do confroencontro dialógico entre Mikhail Bakhtin e Walter Benjamin: uma leitura crítica do romance e sua adaptação para a série televisiva
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We aim to create a critical reading approach to the novel The Handmaid's Tale (1996) by Canadian author Margaret Atwood and its homonymous adaptation for the TV series produced by Bruce Miller (2017-), in the light of the contrast-dialogue between Walter Benjamin and Mikhail Bakhtin, considering the categories of language and discourse. To this end, the specific objectives are: to discuss the theory of language in Benjamin and Bakhtin, considering the accordance and dissonance in their thought; to analyze how the language, from the point of view of Benjamin and Bakhtin, is rescued through the actions of the characters in the novel The handmaid’s tale (1996) and its adaptation to the TV series; to explore the categories of closed and disclosed discourses in the theoretical thought of Walter Benjamin and Mikhail Bakhtin; to investigate how the closed discourses in the novel The handmaid’s tale (1996) and its adaptation to the TV series are desecrated by the disclosed discourses, considering the thought of Benjamin and Bakhtin. In methodological terms, since our corpus is constituted of a series and a novel, we will analyze them in the light of critical literary and cultural theories, using qualitative bibliographical research with an exploratory character as the technical procedure. The theoretical framework was the following: to discuss language and discourse we used the work of Mikhail Bakhtin (1987, 2014, 2015, 2018a, 2018b, 2019); and the writings of Walter Benjamin (1994, 2013, 2020). By way of conclusion, the critical reading of the novel The Handmaid's Tale (1996) and its adaptation for the series of the same name in the light of the dialogical confrontation between Benjamin and Bakhtin allowed us to identify the reification of the use of language by the dictatorship of Gilead as a strategy of oppression and civil domination, as well as the redemption of this language through the disruptive actions of the characters who stood up to the system. In terms of discourse, we detected in the characters' speech the impoverishment of verbal communication between individuals, as well as closed discourses originating from the dictatorship of Gilead which prevented individuals from elaborating their positions against the system, just as it was possible to see open discourses in the words of the characters who stood up to the oppression of the figures representing the power of Gilead. The dialogical confrontation between Walter Benjamin and Mikhail Bakhtin proved to be productive, as it was possible to find points of encounter and confrontation in the categories of language and discourse: in "language" we see that for Bakhtin, language is dialogical, full of social voices; for Benjamin, it is only in the interrelationship with the other that significant and creative potential is manifested. As far as discourse is concerned, Bakhtin sees it as heterodiscursive, tense with opinions, with the voices of others; in Benjamin, discursive openness occurs in the libertarian tone of technical reproducibility, of revolutionary history, for example.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,021 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».