Efeitos do sexismo no trabalho sobre a saúde mental: uma revisão sistemática
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective: To identify the effects of sexism in the workplace (in the forms of sexual harassment, payment inequality, career progression obstacles and sex discrimination) on workers’ mental health through a systematic review of the scientific literature. Method: A search strategy with Boolean Operators, MeSH terms and keywords related to working women, sexual and workplace harassment, gender pay gap, career mobility and depressive symptoms or disorders was applied in five databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, Web Of Science, LILACS and CINAHL), from which 1613 articles were analysed by title and abstract, 314 read in full by two reviewers and 105 matched the inclusion criteria. Data of interest from 58 articles were not available for extraction, thus these were excluded. Comorbidities (e.g., anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep problems) were only included if the study also assessed depression. The final sample consisted of 47 articles, which had their methodology assessed though the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: The most commonly studied subject was sexual harassment. Several work areas and different country populations are represented in these articles, being the Unites States of America the most common affiliation source of authors. All studies were published by, or in collaboration with Universities in developed countries. Few studies considered gender according to self-report and the intersection between sex and race, highlighting the need for more studies about sexism in the workplace being conducted around the world, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries, which are currently underrepresented. Data extracted from 47 articles suggest that women are more exposed to sexual harassment and assault in the workplace, have lower salaries, face more gender-related barriers to job promotions and are more exposed to sex discrimination at work. These exposures seem to increase the risk for depression and comorbidities regardless of sex, although women are, in general, more exposed and more affected by these disorders. Conclusion: Women are, in general, more exposed to all sexism-related events at work. Exposure to sexual harassment or assault in the workplace, gender wage gap, difficulties in job promotions or career progression and sex discrimination at work seem to promote mental health disorders such as depression and comorbidities in both sexes. Some results suggest that men might be more vulnerable to develop psychological disorders after being sexually harassed or assaulted in the workplace, however, women are more exposed and more affected by the disorders evaluated in this review.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».