A efetivação das políticas curriculares (Lei 13.415/2017, BNCC e RCG) para o Ensino Médio nas escolas-piloto do Rio Grande do Sul: um olhar para as perspectivas dos sujeitos escolares
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
From a critical dialectical epistemological positioning, this Thesis, inserted in the field of Early Childhood Education educational policies (BRASIL, 2009a; ABRAMOVAY; 1984; 1985; BARBOSA, 2009; CAMPOS, 1979; 2001; 2010; KRAMER, 1982; 1984; 1985; 2003; 2006; 2007; ROSEMBERG, 1992; 2002; 2003), had the general objective of reaffirming the role of the National Literacy Policy. sociopolitical and pedagogical aspects of the first stage of Basic Education in the commitment to guaranteeing children's rights. As guiding issues for the investigation, the following questions were outlined: What conception of Early Childhood Education and literacy do the legal regulations, publications and actions of the National Literacy Policy (2019-2022) highlight? What is the nature of the proposal for Early Childhood Education expressed in the National Literacy Policy? The method used in the investigation process was hermeneutic, through an analytical and careful interpretation of the texts of the documents that established the National Literacy Policy in Brazil (FLICKINGER, 2010; DALBOSCO; SANTA; BARONI, 2018; MATOS DE SOUZA, 2022). Regarding methodology, the research is basic in nature; as for the approach to the problem, it is qualitative in nature (BAUER; GASKEL, 2000); as for the objectives, it is exploratory in nature; in relation to procedures, it is bibliographic and documentary in nature (CELLARD, 2008; FÁVERO; CENTENARO, 2019). To understand the essence of the phenomenon studied, the data produced were discussed based on Textual Analysis Discursive (MORAES; GALIAZZI, 2007). Due to the complexity of the research topic, the theoretical framework took a pluralistic perspective as an anchor, as it was necessary resort to combined theorization (MAINARDES, 2018; TONIETTO, 2018), starting from the epistemological perspectives i) historical-cultural (VIGOTSKI, 2005; 2007; 2018); ii) post-structuralist (BALL, 2005; 2020; DARDOT; LAVAL, 2016; 2019; 2021; DAHLBERG; MOSS; PENCE, 2019; PERONI, 2006; 2018; 2020); and iii) dialectical criticism (FREIRE, 1981; 1989; 2011; 2013; 2014; 2021). From the research, it was possible to conclude that the current educational policies for Early Childhood Education in Brazil, such as the National Curricular Guidelines for Early Childhood Education and its revision (BRASIL, 2009a), standardize discourses that intend as sociopolitical and pedagogical functions to insert the children in participating in a freer, fairer and more supportive society, building new forms of sociability, committed to breaking relations of domination and oppression. This means ensuring the integral care and education of children, respecting their own ways of learning and developing in childhood, through social interactions, dialogical relationships and play. This perspective of education conceives writing as a language, as a social right, as a cultural asset of humanity for the expression of thoughts, ideas, feelings and imagination. Conceptions like these are centered on a democratic understanding of work, which is at odds with the individualistic, authoritarian and compensatory nature presented by the National Literacy Policy, which idealizes Early Childhood Education with the function of preparing children for literacy, anticipating content from Elementary School, in a mechanical and technical way. Therefore, it is concluded that the PNA, as an educational policy of a far-right government, conceives literacy as the teaching of mechanical coding and decoding skills, making the child invisible as a subject of rights, a participant in the learning process , as it focuses on a universal, standardized and homogeneous child model, dictated by the principles of neoliberalism and neoconservatism.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle