Tuberculosis and family health in Fortaleza : access to diagnosis and treatment, control actions and degree of knowledge of health professionals
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Actions to control this disease lie within the Primary Care/ Family Health Program and aim to break the chain of transmission and possible illnesses in the community. The aim of this study was to measure the access to diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis, the control measures developed by Family Health teams in Fortaleza and the degree of knowledge of health professionals. This was a cross-sectional study. Eight Family Health Centers that served more cases of tuberculosis in the first quarter of 2011 were selected. The study population consisted of nurses, physicians, community health worker and TB patients on treatment. Interviews were conducted with TB patients and nurses and doctors. Moreover, nurses, doctors and community health workers answered a survey of knowledge about transmission, diagnosis, prevention, treatment and monitoring of tuberculosis. High level professionals were composed of 31 nurses and 17 doctors. There were 39 women. Mean age was 38.4 years. The most (81.8%) of community health workers had completed high school. Working in the service for three years or more was significant for participation in trainings (p= 0,0001). The initial care of TB treatment was achieved within one week. The follow-up care by doctor or nurse was classified by patients as good, clear and informative about the disease, treatment, medications and their adverse effects. The provision of bus passes was irregular and there was no food aid. There were disagreement responses of users and professionals in the actions of examination and investigation of household contacts. However, they agreed not to perform an active search for respiratory symptoms and educational work in the community. Nurses, doctors and community health workers had ratio of greater than 70% correct answers in tuberculosis. There were no statistically significant differences between nurses and physicians in the total number of correct answers, per question or thematic group. The community health workers who had work up to three years or more had a higher average (p= 0,0414). The weaknesses in tuberculosis control in the teams studied area occurred in actions aimed to involve families and the community, such as research of contacts, educational work in the community, search for respiratory symptoms, hampering access to early diagnosis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».