Effectiveness of a program in nursing interventions to poor knowledge of family caregivers of people undergoing rehabilitation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been considered the most important cause of disability among young people and the most common cause of neurological morbidity. It is therefore necessary that health professionals, including nurses, develop specific knowledge about the assistance not only to the victims but also to the caregivers in order to help them cope with the adverse consequences arising from this type of trauma. In the rehabilitation context, there is little research on the clinical management of people with TBI in rehabilitation process and even the use of Models or Nursing Theories to approach to this group. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a program in nursing interventions for "Knowledge deficit of family caregivers" of people with TBI rehabilitation sequel. It followed the methodology of convergent care research (PCA), a quantitative approach. The study was developed in the hospital sector of the Rehabilitation Center and Readaptation Dr. Henry Santillo (CRER) in the city of Goiânia/GO through August 2012 to January 2013. The study included eight people with TBI, V ranch or superior, who were hospitalized in the period of the study and their caregivers. During data collection a set of instruments and procedures were used. In the evaluation of people with TBI, a protocol interview and physical examination based on the Theory of Orem were used. In the assessment of family caregivers it was applied a structured interview based on the Calgary Assessment Model and Families Intervention, a cognitic assessment using the Mini-Mental State Examination and anxiety assessment by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Based on this initial assessment of patients and their family caregivers, it was developed knowledge evaluation protocols necessary to caregivers with specific focus such as: facilitation of communication, memory training, cognitive stimulation and disease process. The rating scales were inspired by NOC. Then, a program of individual and group intervention was applied to the family caregivers based on NIC (individual and group learning, learning: the health illness process) and in the Learning Theory significant. At the end of the specific intervention program, 72 hours were waited and knowledge post-intervention tests were applied. Sociodemographic data analysis was done by simple descriptive statistics. The diagnoses were identified by consensus of two professionals and checked by a third researcher. To evaluate the results it was used the scores of the NOC indicators (Nursing Outcomes Classifications) and made a comparison of the data obtained before and after 72 hours of interventions through the use of Descartes signals test. The interventions protocol for poor knowledge was effective for training Memory (p = 0.008) and instruction: disease process (p = 0.008). Despite positive clinically results, the program effectiveness of interventions for cognitive stimulation (p = 0.07) and communication improvement (p = 0.12) they could not be statistically proven. Based on these results, it was possible to: highlight the success of intervention program for the diagnosis of insufficient knowledge of the family caregiver training on memory and on the disease process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».