Inclusion of topics of physics particles integrated to the subjects traditionally studied at high school
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is presented in this work a study about the inclusion of topics of physics of particles integrated to the traditionally subjects studied on high school. It is also presented a proposal of how these contents can be used, and the contribution of this practice on the occurrence of a meaningful learning. The survey consists in the development, implementation and evaluation of two Potentially Meaningful Teaching Units - PMTU, which are didactic sequences grounded in theories of learning that foster students to meaningful learning. The survey was implemented in a third grade high school class in a State School of Santa Maria, RS. In the first PMTU, developed in the second quarter of 2013, it was addressed concepts of elementary particle and electricity. Didactic sequences that began with the study of atomic models integrating the topics of elementary particles, electrical charge, quantization and electrification processes were applied. In the second PMTU, applied in the third quarter of 2013, the focus approached had as premise to study the Fundamental Interactions from the idea on field, integrating them to the contents of electric and magnetic fields. Such integration aims to stimulate interest on topics related to Modern and Contemporary Physics, which are related to students daily life. It was developed through the PMTU activities aiming to promote meaningful learning and knowledge construction in the classroom, since elements involved are complex, which makes their integration a challenge for the high school teacher, resulting in changes in their teaching practices. The research showed that the inclusion of topics of physics of integrated particles into the contents of electricity and magnetism, through potentially meaningful teaching units, showed satisfactory results in student learning, results verified by qualitative assessment of the activities undertaken during the year. The analysis of the results obtained with the conceptual maps and questionnaires answered in the first PMTU showed signs of meaningful learning.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».