MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7120714822

Remarks on the use of intravenous bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta

2016· article· pt· W7120714822 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) · 2016
Typearticle
Languept
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueConnective tissue disorders research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOsteogenesis imperfectaBisphosphonateRenal functionOsteoporosisBone Density Conservation AgentsDensitometryProspective cohort studyBone remodeling
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a heritable connective tissue disorder that is mainly characterized by bone fragility, low bone mass and bone deformities. The intravenous bisphosphonate therapy, particularly the pamidronate, has been used widely for the treatment of children with moderate to severe OI. In the standard protocol, pamidronate is given over 4 h on 3 successive days. These infusion cycles are repeated every 2 to 4 months (according to the age group). In addition, many knowledge gaps remain in particular regarding long-term safety and efficacy of bisphosphonate treatment. Objectives: Evaluate the following specific aspects of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy in OI patients: 1- evaluated safety and efficacy of a simpler protocol with pamidronate. 2- Describe the long-term treatment outcomes with intravenous bisphosphonate. Patients and Methods: 1- This was a prospective study and comprised 18 patients with a clinical diagnosis of OI type I (n=9), III (n=4) and IV (n=5), who were seen in the Bone Fragility Clinic from the São Paulo Hospital, UNIFESP; patients received intravenous pamidronate infusion in a single dose of 2 mg per kg body weight over a 2-h period, every 4 months during 1 year. Biochemical profile, including serum levels of creatinine, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, microalbuminuria, urine volume and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were performed during 1 week every each infusion. Kidney ultrasound, bone densitometry and X-ray films were performed during the study. The safety and efficacy data from this group were compared to historic controls, treated with standard protocol that received pamidronate treatment intravenously over 4 h at a dose of 1 mg per kg body weight on 3 consecutive days. Cycles were repeated every 4 months. 2- Restrospective chart review study reviewed 37 children with OI (OI type I, n=1; OI type III, n=14; and OI type IV, n=22) who were followed at the Shriners Hospital for Children?Canada, in Montreal and who started intravenous bisphosphonate therapy before 5 years of age and who had a subsequent follow-up period of at least 10 years (median 14.8 years), during which they had received intravenous pamidronate or zoledronic acid treatment for at least 6 years during growth. Anthropometry, lumbar spine densitometry, clinical-surgical parameters and markers of bone metabolism were performed during the follow-up period. Results: 1- The participants of the modified protocol had a mild transient post-infusion increases in serum creatinine between 8 and 24 hours after intravenous pamidronate infusion but it was recovered to baseline value 7 days after each infusion. At the end of the study, mean serum creatinine levels remained similar from baseline (baseline: 0.40 ± 0.13 mg/dl end of study: 0.41 ± 0.11 mg/dl; p=0.79). The two protocols led to similar changes in serum creatinine during the first pamidronate infusion (modified protocol: +2 % ± 21 %; standard protocol: -3 % ± 8 %; p= 0.32). Serum calcium and phosphorus decreased similarly in both protocols during the first 24 h of the first pamidronate infusion. Areal lumbar spine bone mineral density Z-scores increased similarly in both protocols (from -2.7 ± 1.5 to -1.8 ± 1.4 with the modified protocol, and from -4.1 ± 1.4 to -3.1 ± 1.1 with standard protocol, p= 0.68) 2- During the observation period, the mean lumbar spine areal bone mineral density Z-score (LS-aBMD) increased from ?6.6 ± 3.1 to ?3.0 ± 1.8 (p<0,001), and weight Z-score increased from ?2.3 ± 1.5 to ?1.7 ± 1.7 (p=0.008). At the time of the last assessment, patients with OI type IV had significantly higher height Z-scores than a control group of patients matched for age, gender, and OI type. Patients had a median of six femur fractures and five tibia fractures during the follow-up period. At baseline, 35% of vertebra were affected by compression fractures, whereas only 6% of vertebra appeared compressed at the last evaluation (p< 0.001), indicating vertebral reshaping during the treatment. Nevertheless, 43% of the pacients needed spinal fusion surgery for scoliosis treatment. Conclusions: 1- The modified pamidronate protocol with a shorter infusion (sigle dose, over 2-h period) for the treatment of children and adolescents with OI did not led to impairment in the renal function and showed an increase in LS-aBMD during the follow-up period, with similar effects on bone density as the standard pamidronate protocol. 2- The long-term intravenous bisphosphonate therapy was associated with higher Z-scores for lumbar spine areal bone mineral density, an improvement in vertebral reshaping and in the weight Z-score. In the patients with OI type IV, an addicional benefit could be seen on height Z-score. However, long-bone fracture rates were still high and some patients developed scoliosis progression.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,071
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,743

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo)Même sujetConnective tissue disorders researchTravaux en français237 207