Contours of transformations of the geographical structure of think tanks
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article is devoted to the geographical study of the phenomenon of think tanks. From the standpoint of the historical and geographical approach, the stages of its spatial diffusion are assessed, and a noticeable acceleration of the process has been noted since the last quarter of the XX century. The purpose of the study is to identify the features of the spatial regrouping of forces in the world expert and analytical community in the early XXI century based on data from the international program “Analytical Centers and Civil Society”. Territorial shifts are analyzed in two categories of structures—with basic functions and the largest organizations with global prestige, and on three scales—at the level of macroregions, countries and cities. The significant predominance of the former sets the main “visible” trends in the development and transformation of the main parameters of the geographical structure of the international expert and analytical community. Due to the spatial unevenness of the growth of analytical centers, a fairly high level of their territorial concentration remains, with a noticeable decrease in territorial differentiation and a change in territorial composition along the path to polycentrism due to the emergence of new “poles of growth” in the Global South. Based on quantitative indicators, modern models of the formation of thought factories in the countries of the world are proposed, and their grouping is given. Analytical centers with basic functions are becoming a widespread phenomenon and a necessary attribute of a large city; their elite is very limited and concentrated in select centers. 174 such structures are based in 89 cities in 55 countries. 2/5 of them are concentrated in European megacities, 1/4 each in America and Asia, and less than 1/10 in other regions of the world. Their actual location is determined primarily by the metropolitan area factor. Taking into account the level of concentration of the world’s leading think tanks, several categories of expert and analytical centers have been identified: the largest (Washington), large (London, New Delhi), medium-sized (Beijing, Brussels), small (28 cities) and emerging (141 cities). Despite the obvious resources of the think tanks in increasing the country’s international importance and authority, Russia is still lagging behind, and is represented only by Moscow in the world ranking of expert and analytical centers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle