MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7125702907 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18371733

Clivina (Leucocara) Bousquet 2009, subgen. n.

2009· article· W7125702907 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Yves Bousquet

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Établissements canadiensAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaSubgenusGenusClawMandible (arthropod mouthpart)DorsumApex (geometry)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Subgenus Leucocara Bousquet, subgen. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 05AD95B8-1397-46E1-89C5-1A9CC5CD819F Type species: Clivina americana Dejean, 1831 (here designated) Etymology. From the Greek leukos (white) and kara (head). The name is proposed in memory of Donald Robert Whitehead [1938–1990] who had an interest in Clivina and the Clivinini in general. His family name has been used in the past to denote a scaritine genus (Whiteheadiana Perrault) and a curculionid genus (Whiteheadia Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal). Recognition. Members of this subgenus differ from those of other Nearctic Clivina by the presence of a small, apically truncate preapical protuberance on the mesotibia with its seta inserted apically. Description. Head. Supraantennal lobes not prominent, distinctly posteriad anterior edge of clypeus. Lateral wings of clypeus isolated from median portion by extension of frontal impressions; median portion of clypeus coarsely beaded. Labrum with seven long setae. Mandible with scrobe depressed, not distinctly laterad, evident from dorsal aspect. Labial mentum with prominent U-shaped ridge; glossal sclerite acutely carinate medially, carina not sinuate; apex of glossal sclerite with one long seta medially; paramedian pit organs widely separate medially. Prothorax. Pronotum with lateral bead extended to basal edge; posteriolateral angle delimited, angulate; side without accessory dentiform projection posteriad posterior angle. Proepisternum without sculptured band. Elytra. Lateral gutter clearly extended inside humerus, humeral portion clearly delineated; umbilical setae not set up in ringed depressions. Interval 3 with three or four discal setae; second discal seta not adjoining stria 3 though close to it in some individuals, in most individuals relatively close to stria 2 or in middle of interval 3; interval 8 carinate toward apex and briefly toward base. Striae 4 and 5 joined at base. Legs. Profemur ventrally with a small dentiform projection toward apex. Mesotibia with preapical apophysis small, seta apicad (Fig. 2). Abdomen. Sternum III with coxal lines medially; sternum VII with preapical setae on each side proximate, distance between them less than that between medial setae. Phylogenetic status. A small, truncate protuberance of the mesotibia (Fig. 2) is probably the plesiomorphic state among the Clivinini and does not support the idea that Leucocara is monophyletic. In fact, the genus Clivina is a large, inadequately defined complex and consequently the structural characters are difficult to polarize. Therefore, I am unable to offer any morphological evidence that Leucocara is natural. However, the species, at least those I have seen (see “Species included” section), are extremely similar to one another in external features and this is sufficient grounds for recognition of the group until it is subjected to phylogenetic analysis. Geographical distribution. The known range of Leucocara includes the Western Hemisphere Nearctic Region, and the Eastern Hemisphere Palaearctic, Oriental, and Afrotropical Regions. Species included. Names of species belonging to Leucocara are listed in Table 2. Taxonomic remarks about selected taxa are as follows. The Western Hemisphere species Based on Bousquet and Larochelle (1993: 103), the americana group contains five species in North America: C. americana Dejean, C. analis Putzeys, C. californica Van Dyke, C. morula LeConte, and C. rufa LeConte. However, in his unpublished thesis, Nichols (1988: 148) revalidated C. acuducta Haldeman (previously in synonymy with C. americana), synonymized C. morula with C. americana [new synonymy] and reinstated C. analis as a synonym of C. americana. Th is leaves the americana group with five valid North American species: acuducta, americana, californica, morio, and rufa. All these species, except C. californica which is known only from the type locality in Lake County, California, are found in the eastern part of the continent. The group, as far as known, as no representatives in the Neotropical Region. Clivina morio was previously known from the holotype only (Bousquet 2006: 25). I have now seen three additional specimens. Two were collected at UV light in Louisiana, 4.2 mi. NE of Abita Springs, St. Tammany Parish, by V. Brou, one on May 30, 2001, the other one on June 2, 1988. Th ese specimens are in the Louisiana State Arthropod collection, Baton Rouge. The third specimen is in the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Ottawa, and was collected at 12 mi. SW of Lufkin, Trinity Co., Texas on 22 April 1976 by A. Smetana. The species can be distinguished from the other eastern North American species of Leucocara by its size and shorter metepisternum. The four specimens studied of C. morio range between 7.0 and 8.5 mm in size while the largest specimen seen of the other species reach only 6.4 mm. The ratio length of metasternum, measured at the shortest distance between the meso- and metacoxa, and length of metacoxa measured in the same line as the metasternum is 0.9–1.0 in C. morio while it is 1.2–1.5 in the other eastern species. The strial punctures in C. morio are also larger, those on the anterior half of the elytra being larger than the depression around the anterior discal seta while in the other species the strial punctures are subequal or smaller than the depression around the anterior discal seta. The Eastern Hemisphere taxa Despite having seen but few species, there is little doubt that Leucocara is well represented in the Eastern Hemisphere. The tranquebarica group, of which I have seen three species only, includes 15 species (Kult 1951: 18–24) and the natalensis group, of which I have studied but one species, consists of 43 species in Africa (Kult 1959: 179–206). One Asian species, C. zebi Kult, reaches the Australian Region where it is found in New Guinea, New Britain, and Australia (Darlington 1962: 362). The three Afrotropical species of the rugiceps group probably also belong to Leucocara. According to Kult (1959: 176), adults of the rugiceps group have also a small mesotibial protuberance but contrary to those of the natalensis -group have only one pair of preapical setae (instead of two) on abdominal sternum VII. On the other hand, the species of the attenuata group of the Oriental region (five species), despite having a small mesotibial protuberance, have the preapical setae equidistant on abdominal sternum VII (Kult 1951: 18), no discal setae on interval 3 (Kult 1951: 18), the labrum with six setae (Andrewes 1929: 353), and the glossal sclerite with two apical setae (checked on C. striata Putzeys only). In my opinion, this group of species is probably not closely related to Leucocara and would need a new subgeneric name. All remaining groups of species previously included in the subgenus Reichardtula have a long, apically acuminate mesotibial protuberance (Fig. 3). As now restricted, this subgenus is probably, in my opinion, more closely related to Clivina s. str. and Semiclivina than to Leucocara. The only known significant character state shared between Reichardtula and Leucocara is the condition of the preapical setae on each side of sternum VII being proximate. Even if this character is eventually proven to be synapomorphic for these taxa, the clear, unambiguous difference in the mesotibial protuberance would justify the recognition of two distinct subgenera, considering the current classification schema of the genus Clivina.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,053

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,057
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,152 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyTravaux en français237 207