Practical strategies for more diverse housing design: advancing an architectural toolkit for the Transformation Framework
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Societies globally are encountering moments of significant shift, with mobility of people, money, services, and goods happening to unforeseen levels. In the contemporary milieu marked by pronounced migration trends, nations such as Canada stand as exemplars where cultural diversity is both a hallmark and a challenge. The lifestyle patterns emergent from this rich ethnic diversity necessitate an architectural recalibration that accommodates the multifaced demands of mixed-income and mixed-purpose habitation, emphasizing agility, adaptability, and sustainability, particularly within the domain of residential architecture (Sinclair, 2015). Against this dramatic backdrop, the present study first touches upon the recently introduced Architectural Framework, named the Transformation Framework, conceived in response to the growing multicultural fabric of global societies like Canada. This framework advocates an architectural paradigm shift towards agility, emphasizing adaptability and sensitivity to the cultural and environmental specificities of the design (Authors, 2024). Building on the Transformation Framework, this paper then shifts its focus towards the practical application of this framework through a foundational set of design strategies (i.e., architectural toolkit) aimed at facilitating the creation of adaptable, agile, and sustainable spaces and places. In order to shape a practical design toolkit, the research critically engaged with contemporary housing systems to explore aspects such as adaptability, inclusivity, and sustainability. Specifically, the methodology employed a synergistic approach, combining an analysis of globally recognized case studies—such as Muji houses in Japan and IKEA’s BoKlok—with an investigation on innovative design strategies, including Open Building, modular construction, and Design for Disassembly (DfD). Building on these methodologically-grounded insights, the paper transitions from theoretical examination to the development of a foundational set of strategies. These strategies operationalize the Transformation Framework, facilitating its application in residential architecture to promote inclusivity, flexibility, and resilience. Furthermore, the study addresses the necessity for decolonization in architecture, an important reorientation that advocates for a change towards designs that emphasize human relationships and community needs over more traditional formal agendas and structural concerns. By detailing a practical design toolkit informed and inspired by the principles of the Transformation Framework, the findings serve as a blueprint for architects, urban planners, politicians and policymakers striving to reconcile the dual imperatives of social equity and environmental stewardship. Recommendations are advanced that provide design guidance for navigating within an unprecedented, uncertain, dynamic & demanding milieu.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».