Landmark Constitutional Cases that Changed South Africa: Volume 2
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This second volume of landmark constitutional cases builds on the success of Volume 1 by analysing ten additional transformative judgments that have shaped South Africa’s constitutional landscape. The book demonstrates how the Constitutional Court has progressively developed fundamental rights jurisprudence through cases addressing corporal punishment of minors, state accountability for gender-based violence, tax collection powers, strike violence, religious freedom, parental rights of unmarried fathers, Muslim marriages, language rights in education, affirmative action, and electoral reform. South Africa’s 1996 Constitution represented a dramatic break from the country’s apartheid past, establishing a robust Bill of Rights and empowering the Constitutional Court to enforce these rights. Since then, the Court has delivered numerous landmark judgments that have transformed various areas of law and society. While Volume 1 examined foundational cases establishing core constitutional principles, this second volume explores how these principles have been applied and developed in specific domains affecting everyday South Africans. The book aims to provide accessible and comprehensive analyses of complex constitutional jurisprudence for legal practitioners, academics, students, and the public. Each chapter examines a significant judgment by explaining its factual and legal context, identifying its most important constitutional contributions, and tracing its impact on subsequent legislation and jurisprudence. The chapters share a common structure but cover diverse subjects, offering a holistic view of South Africa’s evolving constitutional democracy. This volume makes a distinctive intellectual contribution by moving beyond traditional case commentaries to trace the evolution of South African constitutional law across multiple domains. It highlights how constitutional principles established in early cases have been refined and applied in subsequent judgments and legislation, demonstrating the living nature of the Constitution. The book also reveals patterns in the Court’s jurisprudential approach, particularly its commitment to substantive equality, transformative constitutionalism, and the protection of vulnerable groups. A key feature of the work is its accessibility to non-legal readers while maintaining rigorous legal analysis. The authors have structured each chapter to be standalone yet interconnected with others, allowing readers to understand individual cases while perceiving broader jurisprudential developments. By covering cases from diverse areas of law, the book offers a unique perspective on how constitutional principles transcend traditional legal boundaries to create a coherent rights-based legal system. The book will fill a significant gap in the literature by providing a comprehensive yet accessible analysis of how South Africa’s constitutional jurisprudence has evolved beyond its foundational cases to address contemporary challenges. It will serve as an invaluable resource for understanding the practical impact of constitutional rights on South African society and the ongoing project of transformative constitutionalism.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle