Comment améliorer la prise en soins des personnes âgées présentant un profil palliatif, admises en service d’urgence ?
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Emergency services are increasingly being used by people with multiple chronic illnesses, who are frail, have difficulties in daily activities, and suffer from distressing symptoms. A quarter of emergency patients are aged 65 or older, with 15% being at least 80 years old. Nearly three out of four elderly patients will use emergency services in their last year of life, and half of them in their last month of life. Although palliative care and emergency care seem opposed, it is crucial to consider palliative care in emergency services due to the frequency of use by elderly people at the end of life. Emergency clinicians must make therapeutic decisions quickly for often critical situations. With an elderly and multi-morbid population, clinicians face important ethical questions, including evaluating the benefit-risk ratio of treatments. A major dilemma is deciding whether to continue life-prolonging treatments or initiate a palliative approach, which includes discussions on the intensity of care and the possible limitation of treatments. It is also crucial to respect patients' care goals and quickly assess their ability to understand their health status and treatment options. The palliative approach integrates ethical questions for end-of-life patients, but these questions are often difficult to address in emergencies due to time pressure and a lack of knowledge about the specific needs of frail elderly patients. So, how can we care for an elderly person with a potential palliative profile in emergency services? This thesis has made a significant contribution to addressing this question. In French-speaking Belgium, emergency professionals play important roles in the palliative approach, such as investigator, objectifier, palliative care provider, and care limitation decision-maker. The role of identifier is a key perspective for the future. It is essential to recognize these roles in a continuum of care and study them to highlight their complementarity with those of primary care actors. A consensus with a panel of experts has established palliative care recommendations adapted to the context and prioritized for implementation in emergencies. A major challenge remains the feasibility of their implementation, integrating elements of transition and continuity of care. Furthermore, nearly half of elderly patients admitted to emergency services have a palliative profile, and more than 70% see their health deteriorate over the year, with 37% resulting in death. The SPICT, "Surprise Question," and PICT tools are relevant for helping emergency professionals identify elderly patients with a palliative profile. For the future, it is necessary to test care models that integrate palliative care and geriatrics in emergency services. Additionally, it is important to study the allocation of resources needed to ensure quality care. Supporting the development of skills and knowledge is also crucial, particularly through the creation of training programs for clinicians. These programs should incorporate interprofessional and organizational collaboration.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle