Idiopathic? ?Megaesophagus? ?in? ?a? ?9-month-old? ?Labrador? ?Mix
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 9-month-old male intact Labrador mix was presented to the Cornell University Hospital for Animals (CUHA) Internal Medicine Service on August 15, 2017, with a history of regurgitation and weight loss. The owners reported the patient regurgitating some food or water shortly after every meal since they adopted him at 9-weeks of age. He had been slowly losing weight over the preceding few months despite being a young, active, growing puppy. The primary veterinarian took thoracic radiographs and saw a large diverticulum in the esophagus cranial to the heart and a dilated esophagus throughout the thoracic cavity. He diagnosed megaesophagus, with the primary differential diagnoses being congenital idiopathic megaesophagus or secondary to a persistent right aortic arch. The owners were advised to feed him a slurry in an elevated position and they attempted to keep him upright after meals for 5-6 minutes by holding treats up for him in a chair. They reported this seemed to delay regurgitation for up to an hour. However, he was not monitored closely throughout the day and the owners suspected he often got into things off the counter and outside in the woods while they were gone. The owners opted to bring the patient to Cornell’s Internal Medicine Service to assess his eligibility for surgery to correct the megaesophagus. At Cornell, the patient’s condition was discussed at length with the owners, starting by acknowledging the effort they were making to keep him upright during and after meals, and experimenting to find a consistency of kibble that worked best for him. They were informed that there is not a surgery to correct megaesophagus and that a persistent right aortic arch was unlikely based on radiographic examination, because no narrowing of the esophagus was seen. We offered them additional diagnostics to rule out some acquired causes of megaesophagus (namely blood tests for lead poisoning, hypoadrenocorticism [baseline cortisol], hypothyroidism, and acquired myasthenia gravis [antibodies to acetylcholine receptors]), but they declined further testing and needed time to determine how to proceed. Treatment options for megaesophagus are limited and most approaches focus on management through small, frequent, elevated feedings and regular monitoring for signs of aspiration pneumonia. Options for tube feeding or surgically placed gastrostomy tubes may make it possible for patients to regain and maintain weight, but they do not address the issues of aspirating the dog’s own saliva. There is some evidence that sildenafil, a potent vasodilator, may be an effective pharmacological treatment to reduce instances of regurgitation and increase weight gain in dogs with congenital idiopathic megaesophagus.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,021 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».