MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7127341980 · doi:10.58066/0sqb-vd66

Interview with John Larsen

2025· other· en· W7127341980 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
:unav

Notice bibliographique

RevueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2025
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOfficerSoftware deploymentPresidential systemCadetChose

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Narrator: Larsen, John P. Interviewer: Interviewed by Oryssia Ochitwa Interview Date and Location 3 March 2025, electronic interview over Zoom (recorded in Victoria BC.) Synopsis: This interview covers Retired Captain (Navy) John Larsen’s childhood with the Royal Canadian Air Cadets, his career with the CAF and his experiences as a Public Affairs Officer both in the regular and reserve forces. It discusses his training and briefly covers his time as a naval officer before becoming a Public Affairs Officer. It covers his time as a public affairs officer, both as a regular forces member and a reserve member, as well as why he chose to become a reserve member. It discusses his roles in Canada. He spent a great deal of time assisting with training and other special projects. Larsen discusses his deployment to Italy. He reflects on working with the US military during the 1999 Kosovo Air Campaign and on working with NATO. He discusses how social media and globalization has changed things, in his experience. He reflected on his time working with Captain Chris Henderson, and on the skills that he learned that served him well outside of the military. He discusses his time in Bosnia, and having talked to local media. He discusses the difference between NATO training exercises and regular, Canadian ones. He ended with his reflections on current events and the importance of the Canadian military. 0:00 – 2:35 – Introduction and clarification of rank 1:00 – 3:51 Childhood; Time in the Air Cadets leading to a military career. 3:52 – 5:30 Time as a Naval Officer leading to an opening in Public Affairs; 5:30 – 6:04 ROTP Training plan and schooling 1986-1989; schooling with Ret. Capt. Chris Henderson 6:04 – 6:34 Naval Operations; time as a diver (also with Henderson) 6:34 – 7:40 Transition to Public Affairs; appeal of Public Affairs 7:40 – 8:00 First posting as a Public Affairs officer (with Air Force) 8:00 – 9:40 on-the-job training for Public Affairs 9:40 – 10:43 First posting on an air base in Moosejaw; transition back to the Navy in Halifax 10:43 –13:08 time as a on-base public affairs officer 13:08 – 15:00 time in Halifax; helping with operations 15:00 – 19:35 transition out of the military and back in as a reserve member; overview of deployments 19:35 – 21:15 Experience in the reserves when not on deployment; training and support rolls; growing administrative rolls 21:15 – 23:15 Experience deploying with the Reserve forces 23:15 – 27:41 Experience in US Air Base Aviano during 1999 Kosovo Air Campaign; mission attempts to weaken resolve of enemy leader; Public Affairs roll was to speak to Canadian involvement and work with US forces 27:41 – 29:35 Experience working with the US and on a US base; 29:35 – 31:26 Effects of working with the US on Captain Larsen’s roll; value of Canada in 1999 Kosovo Air Campaign 31:26 –33:57 Roll as a Lead In Theatre Public Affairs Officer in Kosovo; interactions with media; assisting in procuring footage; creating internal messaging 33:57 – 37:14Balancing national defence’s aims, media interviews, and operations personal 37:14 – 39:21 Culture and policy changes with the development of social media; helping develop training. 39:21 – 42:00 How globalization has changed Public Affairs; changing news cycle. 42:00 – 44:01 Experience working with NATO; the US being the driving force 44:01 – 44:57 Other experiences in the CAF through 2019; Training exercises; special projects; Time spent working with Chris Henderson etc. 48: 36 – 50:30 Comfort with shifting chain of command with Chris Henderson; working with different ranks 50:30 – 52:40 Skills that transferred to the civilian world 52:40 –55:30 Favoured rolls in the military 55:30 – Experience in Bosnia, talking to local, Bosnian military; the difference between CAF spokespeople and NATO spokespeople 57:42 – 59:00 Summary of different dates of deployments; NATO experiences 59:00 – Experiences with NATO training exercises 1:02:40 – Time outside the PAO world in the military 1:03:40 – Retirement 1:05:40 – Final Words; importance of the military and thoughts on current affairs; confirmation of consent to be interviewed

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,050
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,107

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,002
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0320,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,276
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)Travaux en français237 207