Effect of semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes and peripheral artery disease: an analysis of the STRIDE trial stratified by disease severity and age
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a prevalent atherosclerotic condition in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) which impairs perfusion in the lower limbs. Disease progression can lead to exercise-induced pain (intermittent claudication) and severe functional impairment. Disease severity at presentation, along with age, may inform prognosis for the affected limb, thereby guiding subsequent treatment strategies. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) is commonly used to screen for lower extremity PAD. In people with T2D, however, vessel incompressibility due to medial arterial calcification may result in a falsely normal or elevated ABI. The alternative toe-brachial index (TBI) is less susceptible to incompressibility artefacts from medial calcification in the digital arteries. Guidelines recommend TBI <0.7 as a diagnostic cutoff for PAD in patients with incompressible ABIs. The STRIDE trial demonstrated that semaglutide improved functional parameters, symptom status and haemodynamic measures in patients with PAD. Whether these benefits were consistent across measures of PAD severity and age is not known. Purpose To investigate whether the benefits of semaglutide in STRIDE were consistent by baseline PAD severity and age. Methods STRIDE enrolled 792 participants with PAD and T2D who were randomised to receive either once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 1.0 mg or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary and a confirmatory secondary endpoint were change in maximum walking distance (MWD) and pain-free walking distance (PFWD) on a constant load treadmill (fixed speed: 3.2 km/h and fixed inclination: 12%), respectively, at week 52. These endpoints were measured as ratio to baseline and presented as estimated treatment ratios, a ratio of the endpoints in semaglutide vs placebo groups. Analyses were stratified according to age (<65 and ≥65 years) and median TBI status (<0.52 and ≥0.52). A mixed model for repeated measures analysis, with an interaction term between the treatment and relevant subgroups adjusted for baseline of the endpoint, was performed. Results Participants had a mean (SD) age of 66.6 (9.4) years and a baseline geometric mean (CV) TBI, MWD and PFWD of 0.48 (0.4), 190.5 (0.6), and 116.2 (0.6), respectively. At Week 52, MWD ratio to baseline (geometric mean) in semaglutide vs placebo groups were 1.35 vs 1.14 in the <65-year group and 1.2 vs 1.08 in the ≥65-year group, respectively, and 1.24 vs 1.1 in the TBI <0.52 group and 1.3 vs 1.11 in the TBI ≥0.52 group. Similar trends were observed for PFWD. No significant interactions were observed with TBI or age groups for treatment effects on MWD and PFWD (Figure). Conclusions These analyses demonstrate a consistent benefit of semaglutide across different levels of lower limb perfusion deficit, as assessed by TBI recordings, in individuals with T2D and PAD. Additionally, the benefit of semaglutide persists across age groups, for functional outcomes, which are often negatively impacted by age.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».