Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Narrator: Retired Lieutenant Colonel Chris Kilford, 1961- Interviewer: Interviewed by Matthew Bacon Interview Date and Location: 07 March 2025, Victoria, BC. Synopsis: Retired Lieutenant Colonel Chris Kilford discusses his experiences with the Canadian Armed Forces, with a particular focus on his time working with and alongside NATO organizations. The first 15 minutes of the interview are dedicated to understanding Kilford's upbringing as well as his early deployment history with the military up until approximately 2001. From 14:37 to 34:29, the discussion shifts to focus on his experiences at the Canadian Forces College. In this section, we discuss the thinking within the college before the events of September 11th, 2001, specifically the focus on the Canadian military’s failures in Rwanda and Somalia. Furthermore, following the events of 9/11, Kilford examines his personal experiences with the shifting dynamic of warfare and doctrine during the War on Terror. From 34:29 to 54:43, Kilford discusses his experiences with the Chief Force Development (CFD), Acting Director of Future Security Analysis, Deputy Director of the Canada First Defence Strategy team, and as a Military Liaison Officer between the Department of National Defence and the Standing Senate Committee on National Defence. This section largely covers Kilford’s transition into the political aspects of NATO. From 54:43 to 01:55:46, Kilford discusses his experiences as a Deputy Canadian Defence Attache at the Canadian Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan (2009-2010) and as the Canadian Defence Attache at the Canadian Embassy in Ankara, Turkey (2011-2014). Kilford’s experiences at the Afghan and Turkish embassies are the heart of this interview, delving deep into his time working with and alongside NATO organizations. Specifically, his experience during this time focuses on the discussion regarding the ‘ground truth’ or reality of the situation on the ground. Finally, the last 15 minutes of the interview focus on Kilford’s experiences outside of the Canadian Armed Forces, specifically his visits to the Canadian Battlegroup in Latvia. 00:00-00:53—Introduction. 00:53-03:50—Background Information. 03:50-14:37—Early Service Record. 14:37-34:29—Canadian Forces College, 2001-2004. 34:29-52:10—Chief Force Development (CFD), Acting Director of Future Security Analysis, Deputy Director of the Canada First Defence Strategy team, 2004-2008. 52:10-54:43—Military Liaison Officer between the Department of National Defence and the Standing Senate Committee on National Defence, 2008-2009. 54:43-01:20:05—Deputy Canadian Defence Attache at the Canadian Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, 2009-2010. 01:20:05-01:55:46—Canadian Defence Attache at the Canadian Embassy in Ankara, Turkey, with the responsibility for military relations between Canada and Turkey, Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Turkmenistan, 2011-2014. 01:55:46-02:06:44—Additional Questions. 02:06:44-02:08:06—Closing Remarks.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,017 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,047 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».