Effect of oral semaglutide on CV outcomes across the vascular disease spectrum, from no vascular disease to polyvascular disease, in high-risk type 2 diabetes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction In the SOUL trial, oral semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) when compared with placebo in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Purpose In these pre-specified analyses of the SOUL trial, we sought to determine whether the effect of oral semaglutide on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes varies based on the extent of vascular disease at baseline. Methods In SOUL, 9,650 participants aged ≥50 years with T2D (HbA1c 6.5–10%) and ASCVD and/or CKD were randomised to oral semaglutide or placebo. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the treatment effect of oral semaglutide on time to first MACE (CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], non-fatal stroke) by number of vascular beds (coronary, cerebral or peripheral) affected at baseline (0, 1 or ≥2 [polyvascular]). Results Of 8,291 participants in whom data about the exact number of vascular beds were known, 1,244 (15.0%) had CKD but no known ASCVD, 5,122 (61.8%) had a single vascular bed affected and 1,925 (23.2%) had polyvascular disease at baseline. Coronary heart disease (CHD) was the most common type of vascular disease reported (69.8%), followed by cerebrovascular disease (24.3%) and peripheral arterial disease (17.5%) with significant overlap among the 3 affected vascular beds (Figure 1). Participants with vascular disease were more likely to be male, White and current smokers, compared with those without known atherosclerosis. Body weight and body mass index (BMI) were balanced across subgroups. Of those with single-bed vascular disease, 45.4% had a prior MI and 12.6% had a prior stroke while in those with polyvascular disease, 48.5% had a prior MI and 42.6% had a prior stroke. Compared with participants who had CKD but no known ASCVD (98/1244 [7.9%]; incidence rate [IR] 2), the risk of MACE was progressively higher in those with single-bed vascular disease (617/5122 [12.0%]; IR 3.1 [HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.27–1.94]) and polyvascular disease (369/1925 [19.2%]; IR 5.3 [HR 2.62; 95% CI 2.11–3.29]) (Figure 2). Despite being at lower overall risk of CV events, those with CKD but no known ASCVD who were randomised to semaglutide had fewer MACE (38/633 [6.0%]; IR 1.5) when compared with placebo (60/611 [9.8%]; IR 2.5) (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39–0.88; Figure 2). However, there was no evidence that the effect of oral semaglutide varied based on number of vascular beds affected by atherosclerosis (p-value [interaction]=0.15). Numbers needed to treat were low (38–58) across subgroups (Figure 2). Conclusion In the SOUL trial, more extensive vascular disease was associated with higher risk of MACE. Oral semaglutide reduced the risk of MACE, irrespective of number of affected vascular beds, which supports the initiation of semaglutide in T2D with CKD, even in the absence of known ASCVD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».