A Mobile App with Virtual Physical Therapy Support for Shoulder Rehabilitation Following Breast Reconstruction: A Pilot Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer for Canadian women and one in five breast cancer survivors (BCS) will elect to have breast reconstruction. Despite the benefits of reconstruction, residual shoulder dysfunction is a problem for many. This study introduces a mobile application (app)-based shoulder rehabilitation program developed to address functional outcomes of the shoulder, for women who have had breast reconstruction. Purpose: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a shoulder rehabilitation program, delivered by a mobile app, ShApp (Avicenna™), to improve functional outcomes through easy access to rehabilitation for post-reconstruction BCS. Additionally, to evaluate the validity and reliability of ShApp for measuring shoulder range of motion (ROM) in a population of BCS. Methods: A randomized controlled study design was used. Twenty-two women (mean age 46.91, SD 9.84) were recruited. Sixteen women completed the study after being enrolled and randomized into two groups (control or rehabilitation). The main inclusion criteria were women aged 18 years and older with a mobile phone capable of app download and second device for videoconferencing. The main exclusion criteria were health-related issues that would interfere with their ability to complete the program. The program began 6 weeks post-operatively. During the 8-week app program, both groups had access to the app’s educational material, while the rehabilitation group also had access to its exercise program. Outcome measures (shoulder ROM and function, pain, fatigue, and quality of life [QoL]) were all collected on the app at Week 1, 4, and 8, during a videoconference via the Zoom platform with the two physical therapist (PT) evaluators (one blinded and one not blinded to groupings). At program completion, participants answered an anonymous satisfaction survey. Between and within group differences for all measures were analyzed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA; p < .05) or Friedman’s test (p < .05). Results: Both control (n = 10) and rehabilitation (n = 12) groups showed improved ROM as measured by ShApp, with statistically significant overall effects for extension (control: p = .005; rehab: p = .022) and flexion (control: p = .038). No statistically significant changes were found for abduction, internal or external rotation. Scores for the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) indicated a statistically significant time x group interaction, F(2, 40) = 3.53, p = .039. Post-hoc comparisons showed statistically significant differences for the rehabilitation group between Week 1 (M = 49.08, SD = 14.00) and Week 8 (M = 68.17, SD = 14.33), p = .005, and between Week 4 (M = 58.08, SD = 12.80) and Week 8 (M = 68.17, SD = 14.33), p = .031. A statistically significant main effect of time was also observed, F(2, 40) = 13.14, p < .001, with post-hoc comparisons between Week 1 (M = 53.14, SD = 15.96) and Week 4 (M = 59.73, SD = 14.69), p = .025; Week 1 (M = 53.14, SD = 15.96) and Week 8 (M = 66.32, SD = 15.88), p = .001; and Week 4 (M = 59.73, SD = 14.69) and Week 8 (M = 66.32, SD = 15.88), p = .025. No between-group differences were observed. Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores showed statistically significant improvement over time in both groups (control: p = .028; rehab: p < .001), with notable gains in the rehabilitation group from Week 1 to Week 8 (p = .003). A very strong correlation was found between evaluation methods for left shoulder extension at Week 4, rs(6) = .918, p = .011, with moderate reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.72, and significant agreement, β = .650, p = .014. Other ROM measures demonstrated strong correlations and moderate agreement, though limited reliability. Data completeness was affected by missing app entries, likely due to user error. There were no adverse responses and participants reported high satisfaction, highlighting ease of use and helpful content. Conclusion: The app program together with PT support is feasible and effective and women in both groups appeared to have improved shoulder flexion and extension ROM at the completion of the eight-week program. Although not significant, the rehabilitation group also appeared to have improved QoL, shoulder function, and fatigue compared to the control group. A strong correlation, moderate intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value, and significant agreement between ShApp and visual inspection for ROM values when data were complete, support its concurrent validity and provides evidence of reliability for measuring shoulder ROM. The addition of high participant satisfaction further substantiates ShApp’s functionality.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».