MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7130849143 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18726956

Thesis: A Unified Structural Theory of Complex Systems — Formal Laws, Epistemic Constraints, and Self-Organization Across Physical, Cognitive, and Social Domains

2006· dissertation· W7130849143 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2006
Typedissertation
Langue
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueComplex Systems and Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComplex systemBounded rationalityBounded functionMetaphorContradictionAmbiguityConsciousnessQualiaTransformational leadership

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Author: Boris Kriger Affiliations: Information Physics Institute, Gosport, UK Institute of Integrative and Interdisciplinary Research, Toronto, Canada Type: Doctoral Thesis (PhD by Publication / Opus Magnum) Description: This doctoral thesis presents a unified structural theory of complex systems, synthesized from over seventy original publications spanning 1999–2026. The central result is that persistence — the capacity of a system to maintain structural viability over time — is the primary organizing principle of complex systems across all domains. This is established not as a metaphor but as a substrate-independent mathematical theorem: the same formal constraints govern the organizational logic of physical systems, cognitive architectures, social institutions, and astrophysical structures. Part I establishes the meta-theoretical foundation: the Law of Scale-Specific Principles (no final all-encompassing theory is possible), the Formalization Laws (every formal description is bounded, structurally determined, and necessarily plural), the Principle of Definition-Dependent Provability, and the Epistemic Constraint Theory (inferential capacity is bounded by the minimum of computational, observational, and structural constraints). Part II develops the dynamical core: the Transformational Basis of Persistence (structural viability as the formal condition for persistence), structural resilience in discrete-state systems, four laws of self-organizing systems (Cooperation, Viability, Interference, Observability — proved independent and complete), cyclical closure and self-sufficiency, the emergence of Newtonian dynamics from metric inertial axioms, the Constraint–Autonomy Compatibility Law, and the Viability Mismatch Law. Part III derives the architecture of cognition and consciousness as structural necessities: the Structural Distortion Principle (perception as world-maintenance under bounded resources), the evolutionary inevitability of predictive processing, representational isolation, the atemporality of memory, the functional sufficiency framework for consciousness, the formalization of mental disintegration phenomena through dynamical systems theory, and the identification of inadequate biological programs in human decision-making. Part IV extends the theory to social and multi-agent systems: formal frameworks for deception and perceived reality, autonomy suppression in hierarchical systems, the Principle of Structural Non-Neutrality, conflict as phase transition, the Asymmetry of Totalizing Ideals, extractive oscillators with sensor degradation (applied to narcissistic dynamics, addiction, and exploitative platform design), non-participation and pre-integrative rejection as institutional strategies, conceptual responsibility, assertion–dismantling cycles, the Comparative Asymmetry Principle, and the Reflexive Inference Law. Part V demonstrates applications: binary star formation as persistence-selected outcome, dormant neutron stars, the Ledger Time Model, biospheric and synthetic contributions to effective complexity, holographic universe evaluation, clinical discontinuity and AI, AI-extended agents and the transformation of communication, the Stimulus Problem in post-scarcity environments, the Inward Turn (Fermi Paradox), the inevitability of a unified civilization of autonomous agents, and viral dynamics as information propagation. Three methodological principles distinguish the work: constraint derivation rather than model postulation; substrate abstraction with formal proof; and recursive self-application (the theory applies to the system that produced it). The thesis concludes that persistence over the perception of reality is the primary organizing principle — truth-seeking, consciousness, social organization, and scientific inquiry are derived as instruments of persistence, not as ends in themselves. Keywords: complex systems, persistence, viability, self-organization, epistemic constraints, predictive processing, structural theory License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Language: English Related identifiers (selected): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18435982 (The Transformational Basis of Persistence) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18363729 (Four Formal Laws of Self-Organizing Systems) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18099738 (No Final Theory: Law of Scale-Specific Principles) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18099527 (Formalization Laws) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18365738 (Epistemic Constraint Theory) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18444910 (Evolutionary Inevitability of Predictive Processing) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18452700 (The Structural Distortion Principle) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18556979 (Formalization of Mental Disintegration Phenomena) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18484819 (Conflict as Phase Transition) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18437440 (The Inward Turn)

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,695
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,001
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle