MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7131431194 · doi:10.1109/cepsi66359.2025.11403394

Dynamic System Rating for Transmission Corridors

2025· article· W7131431194 sur OpenAlexaff
Chirag Mistry, David J MacDonald, Mital Kanabar, Abraham Varghese, Seán Norris

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineEngineering
ThématiquePower System Optimization and Stability
Établissements canadiensCanadian Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLimit (mathematics)Renewable energyTransmission (telecommunications)Electric power systemElectric power transmissionQuality (philosophy)LimitingAccelerationDynamic network analysis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The integration of high levels of Renewable Energy Capacity within existing electrical grids, which were designed to transmit power from conventional generation sources to major load centers is rapidly changing, where network congestion is one example of the problems faced by many operators in the acceleration of decarbonized system. This includes existing congested corridors coupled with new areas of congestion within sections of the network that would not traditionally have been associated with generation. Not only does this lead to limited ability to rapidly deploy and connect new renewable sources but it can also lead to curtailment of the existing fleet at significant constraint costs and could potentially provoke voltage quality and stability issues. Whilst the transmission capacities of the network can be improved through network reinforcements, this may in many cases prove prohibitively expensive and time-consuming (multi-year) thus delaying the renewable deployment. One of the key constraining factors on network capacity is the thermal limit of the conductor and therefore there has been widespread testing and implementation of both sensor-based and sensor-less Dynamic Line Rating technology which monitors the dynamic thermal rating of the line bases based on measurements of current, temperature or sag.The thermal limit is not the only limiting factor to network capacity, and dynamically increasing the rated capacities within the network could result in voltage quality and stability risk, in some applications. Dynamic Line Rating technology alone is insufficient as a basis for autonomous control actions to adapt and optimize network power flows. This paper proposes monitoring of not only the thermal limits but also potential quality and stability issues that may arise, by the online calculation of Dynamic Power Ratings for a local network zone.To utilize the additional power transfer capacity available and mitigate existing network congestion, control actions can be taken which will be highly dependent upon the local resources. For these control actions to be effective, they need to be realized in very small latencies approaching real-time; the paper proposes a local approach to the required control actions, rather than rely on the centralized controls typically managing grid power flows. This fast acting, intelligent, edge-based control response is called Zonal Autonomous Control (ZAC).Such is the scale of network congestion and consequently on renewable energy curtailment, that curtailment penalties in the United Kingdom, for example, have reached nearly £1Bn per annum [1]. This is because more than 3.8 million MWh would otherwise have been generated and transmitted to the grid if it were not for network congestion: put simply the network was not built with these new generation sites in mind, and power flows are limited due to thermal, voltage quality or stability constraints. In some areas of the network where angular stability is a key concern, protection schemes can be installed to mitigate this risk, thus realizing further capacity in the corridor until the next limit is reached, such as thermal. Indeed, the same can be said if the thermal limit is increased as the threshold for voltage and/or angular stability may be reached before the full thermal capacity can be used when monitoring the line ratings. Therefore, a holistic approach which not only monitors the thermal line ratings but also the impact of increasing the capacity on other stability margins must be assessed.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,958
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetPower System Optimization and StabilityTravaux en français237 207