Notice bibliographique
Résumé
14 Baškovič (2016), p. 18-23. "Prehistory": slovenian academic community and transition | 11University of ljubljana had only been able to undertake research work in laboratories, and some "institute people" were also lecturers at the University of ljubljana, so they were being involved in both types of setting.however, research institutes certainly expected more, such as partnership, at least, in the implementation of postgraduate studies.researchers led by saZU advocated for strengthening the scope and quality of postgraduate studies and for reducing the structural development gap with the West.15 in may, 1990, after taking power, the demos government which consisted of a wide-array of opposition figures to the communist led-governments in the late 1980s, dealt mainly with the status transformation of universities and institutes, which was a necessity after the abolition of self-governance.Governmental reforms were not always welcomed by academia, which accused the government of political bias, 16 resulting in the government postponing the much-awaited reforms.The government therefore adopted the Public research institutions act and the research activity act and structural dilemmas had to be delayed for a couple for years.17 already in 1991, the law on higher education had been agreed upon.nevertheless, the University of ljubljana then withdrew from the agreement.The rector of the University of maribor, alojz Križman, complained that the University of ljubljana was withdrawing its consent to the solutions that had already been agreed upon, and that the minister was allegedly supporting this.On the other hand, the University of ljubljana had again taken the position that the government was once again using the University of maribor and its readiness to accept the government's views in order to apply pressure on the University of ljubljana concerning the reform.1815 Oset (2017), p. 146-148.16 archives of saZU, Presidency 1990-1992.17 interview with Borut lavrič (14 may 2019).18 Požar and Urh (1991), p. 26.23 ivelja (1995); see also Zupančič (1997Zupančič ( ), p. 71-76.24 turk (1990)); Pelicon (1990); Zidanšek (1992).25 tišler (2001), p. 28-45; see also adam (1999), p. 65. "Prehistory": slovenian academic community and transition | 15 Academic Prof. Dr. Boštjan Žekš's inscription to the Book of honorary guests on 15 October 2015, after being awarded the UNG gold plaque.26 27 see also Špacapan (1997), p. 19-22; see also Pečan (1998), p. 23-24; Krnel Umek (2004).28 toplak (2000); see also Kontler salamon (2005b).36 franko (1997), p. 97-98; nm (2005).37 Špacapan (1997), p. 18-22.38 Krnel Umek (2004), p. 13-16; Plesničar (1997), p. 43-48.39 Bieber and heppner (2015).40 interview with danilo Zavrtanik (15 June 2019) and Boštjan Žekš (15 January 2020).Joseph F. Sutter, Honorary Doctor of UNG, on the importance of science in society.49 research groups and provided with the necessary research equipment and facilities.already at the time of its establishment, the key goal was to establish the conditions for research work at the school of environmental sciences.The precondition for this was the acquisition of premises.50 49 UnG archives, Book of honorary guests.50 UnG archives, reserach on establishment of the Postgraduate school of environmental science.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,029 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».