Effective teaching and adaptive instruction in core French: a case study of a grade 8 classroom in Ontario
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The impetus for this study was provided by an on-going debate over the suitability of second language education for students who underperform in these programs and whether it is possible for teachers to effectively address these students' needs within the confines of the current conception of successful second language instruction in Ontario. Qualitative and quantitative observational techniques were used to identify and describe a Grade 8 core French teacher's use of pedagogical strategies that have been previously designated in research on learning disabilities, effective teaching, and/or second language education as helpful for facilitating student success. A series of semi-structured teacher interviews were conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the belief systems, contextual influences, and decision-making processes that impacted this teacher's pedagogy. In addition, a series of seven individual semi-structured student interviews were held in an effort to understand the students' perceptions and conceptions of their learning experience in core French. At the conclusion of the study, a focus group interview comprised of these seven students was organized to provide a forum for further exploration of issues that were raised during the individual interviews. Overall, the teacher participant in this study can be viewed as an effective educator of students with learning difficulties and other learning needs within the context of the core French classroom. The teacher was found to have created a classroom environment defined by characteristics of an effective inclusive classroom through her use of adaptation strategies and was respectful of the tenets of the approach to second language education mandated by the Ontario Ministry of Education. Results from the teacher and student interviews indicate a strong perception of the effectiveness of these strategies in facilitating student proficiency in the target language. Further, the teacher's apparent success in fostering student learning in spite of a wide range of individual learner needs is primarily attributable to her own skill in negotiating her pedagogical content knowledge and a strong belief in her ability to foster student achievement.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».