Teacher experience and teacher identity: A case study of three math teachers learning to teach in a Canada-China Reciprocal Learning Project
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We can improve the quality of learning for teachers by studying the experiences of teacher learning. Through my facilitation of a group of three Math teachers in a Canada-China Reciprocal Learning Project over two years, I investigated teachers' experiences of learning in depth. I used a qualitative research approach to engage teachers in reflecting actively on their process of learning. Evidence of their learning was gathered by conducting interviews, observing lessons that they taught, visiting their workplaces, and reviewing documentary data of their teaching and learning. A couple of theoretical foundations-Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory and Ying's Social Constructive Learning Theory guided the research in examining how authentic teacher learning develops, as well as how social, community, and personal factors interactively influence a teacher's learning experience. Additionally, I examined the relationships between teacher's experiences of learning and their perceptions of teacher identity. The findings indicated that the experiences of teachers contributed to and continued to modify their perspectives of identifying themselves professionally, while teachers' perceptions of their professional identity influenced their ways of learning and teaching practices. The findings showed: (1) teachers achieved effective learning through interactive dialogues and active reflections; (2) through the partnered activities in the project, teachers built their sustained community of learning; (3) teachers achieved effective learning through engaging other stakeholders in their process of learning, such as students, principals and parents; (4) teachers' experiences of learning in the partnership were impacted by social factors in their school contexts as well as their personal factors; (5) teachers were self-guided/motivated learners as they sought resources to assist their teaching and other professional work at school; and (6) their partnership learning experiences potentially influenced teachers' school practices. Implications from this study suggested that authentic teacher learning is personal as well as socially constructed. Teacher educators need to respect teachers' voices regarding what they need to learn, and how they want to learn. Centering teachers in the learning process is essential for effective teacher learning. Obstacles for learning were discussed in the last chapter, and suggestions for future research were also included in the thesis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,038 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».