FSL Methodology Courses: Closing the Gap between Theory and Practice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract In its report “Transition to Teaching” (2020) the Ontario College of Teachers (OCT) notes the high demand for French as a Second Language (FSL) teachers and that early full employment was the norm for most Ontario graduates with these qualifications. Despite this optimistic outlook for novice French teachers, French-language program graduates allow their Ontario teaching licenses to lapse at a much greater rate than their English-language colleagues. These high attrition rates among novice teachers create a vicious circle of teachers leaving before they have had the chance to master good classroom practices and being in turn replaced by novice teachers. The result is a loss of potentially fine FSL teachers and a diminished quality of teaching. Although many factors may contribute to this trend (i.e., lack of a dedicated classroom, lack of resources, lack of administrative support, student behaviour), one must also consider how FSL pre-service programs provide candidates with a sufficient foundation upon which to build a successful career. Much criticism has been leveled at teacher education, which is viewed by many researchers as too theoretical and not in touch with effective classroom practice. While all pre-service courses are intended to add to teacher candidate professional knowledge, Methodology courses, because of their subject specific focus, need to be designed in ways which help students develop the subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge so critical to successful classroom teaching required by a demanding new FSL curriculum. The aim of this study was to examine the perceptions of teacher educators of pre-service FSL Methodology courses and FSL teacher candidates. This study examined FSL Methodology classes at two faculties of education in Ontario. The courses are part of the new two-year teacher education programs and are required courses for all FSL candidates. Participants were asked to share their views on how the Methodology courses supported FSL teacher candidates in developing the intrinsic language and cultural knowledge as well as the pedagogical skills necessary for effective second language teaching in light of the new curriculum demands on both FSL students and teachers. The key questions of the study, which were examined from the point of view of both the teacher educators and the teacher candidates were: “What knowledge and skills do FSL teacher candidates need to acquire which will equip them to meet the requirements detailed in the current Ministry documents?” “What opportunities do the Methodology courses offer to support teacher candidates in acquiring the required knowledge and skills?” and “How can Methodology courses improve teacher candidate knowledge development?” The answers to these questions provide insights to a relatively sparse field of research into how methodology courses in Ontario faculties of education can help teacher candidates as they transition from theoretical concepts to effective classroom practice. Although the research in this study touches on many aspects of the current dilemma of FSL teaching, the focus of the research was to investigate the current FSL Methodology courses and their impact on pre-service candidate skills acquisition. While FSL Initial Teacher Education (ITE) is only one area of concern when considering the problems facing FSL teaching and teachers, it is a very important one. Their entry into the ITE program is the first step for future French teachers into the professional world of FSL teaching, and therefore, the impact of the instruction they receive on their ability to successfully navigate the challenges of the FSL classroom cannot be underestimated.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,034 | 0,034 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,017 |
| Communication savante | 0,013 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».