The Development of Antisocial and Prosocial Lying in Children with and without Severe Conduct Problems
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Lying is a typical part of childhood. However, for some children, such as those experiencing conduct problems, lying becomes problematic and atypical with increased age. Frequent and persistent antisocial lying is thought to be an early symptom of conduct problems. However, until the present thesis, it was unclear why children with conduct problems tell antisocial lies more than typical children. Furthermore, it was unknown whether and how often children with conduct problems tell prosocial lies (i.e., “white lies”), which are lies told to be polite or prevent hurting someone else’s feelings. This thesis outlines 3 studies (N = 316-387) examining antisocial and prosocial lie-telling among 6 to 12 year-old children with and without conduct problems. In Chapter 2, I found that while parents reported that the frequency of children’s antisocial lying increased alongside the severity of conduct problems, the frequency of their prosocial lying did not. Given that parent report methods may be unreliable due to social desirability bias or the inherent nature of lying being deceptive (i.e., parents may not catch their child lying), in Chapters 3 and 4 I examined prosocial and antisocial lying using behavioral measures. In Chapter 3, I used a disappointing gift paradigm to examine whether children would lie about liking a disappointing gift. Consistent with the parent-report results of Chapter 2, children with conduct problems were just as likely to tell a prosocial lie as typically developing children. In Chapter 4, I used a modified version of the temptation resistance paradigm to examine whether children will tell a lie to conceal a minor transgression (a form of antisocial lying). Again, consistent with the parent-report results of Chapter 2, children were more likely to tell an antisocial lie with increased conduct problems. However, theory of mind was shown to act as a protective factor against the relationship between increased antisocial lying and conduct problems. Together, my thesis suggests that children with and without conduct problems engage in different types of lying according to social context, and that socio-cognitive development may play a key role in the reduction of antisocial lying for children with conduct problems.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».