The transition to problem-based learning: Nurse educators' experiences in a collaborative BScN program in Ontario
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Beginning January 1, 2005, the Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BScN) degree becomes the minimal requirement for nursing practice in Ontario, Canada. In response to this legislation, a Collaborative BScN Program was established between McMaster University and Mohawk and Conestoga Colleges. Nurse educators teaching in behaviourist college programs were required to make the transition to a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. A life history approach was employed to understand the experiences of seven nurse educators making the transition to PBL. Individual and contextual influences on the transition experiences were explored over the course of the educators' careers. Transition experiences were significantly influenced by the educators' evolving conceptions of teaching and the context within which they were teaching. As nursing education reorients towards more student-centered teaching and the BScN as entry to practice, the transition needs of nurse educators cannot be ignored. Faculty development and mentoring opportunities facilitate the transition process, however, only through the creation of a culture in which individuals, teaching and learning are highly valued will an ongoing process of personal growth and learning occur. The college context facilitated the educators' initial teaching experiences, but became a "culture of isolation" over the course of their careers. Educators made a conscious effort to recreate a supportive environment within the college BScN teams. While some educators described supportive and empowering transition experiences, others experienced hierarchical relationships, devaluing communication, and a "fragile" working environment. In looking to the future, educators identified a need for a collaborative identity and increased program ownership. Although educators described a shift from teacher to student-centered conceptions of teaching, this transformation occurred through a self-directed process prior to the formation of the Collaborative BScN Program. Teaching in PBL was described as a "coming home" in which educators' conceptions of teaching were finally consistent with their practice. Faculty development and mentoring opportunities were essential in developing an understanding of PBL, gaining the skills of effective tutors and reinforcing educators' confidence in assuming the tutor role. Although supportive of PBL, educators expressed the need for a jointly developed curriculum integrating the clinical strengths of the college partners.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,021 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».