Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis investigated the role of knowledge building pedagogy and technology in medical education. The literature in medical education points to a need for change to better address society's needs for greater community orientation in medicine and integration of new knowledge media. These goals are reflected in the Canadian Medical Education Framework of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons. Knowledge Building is an innovative theoretical framework and pedagogy with emphasis on the engagement of all community members in contributing ideas of value to local communities and society, facilitated by Internet-based knowledge building environments. The goal of this research was to determine the applicability and usefulness of knowledge building across various levels in medical education. Case studies were conducted in four University of Toronto contexts: undergraduate Foundations of Medical Practice Course, Obstetrics/Gynecology Graduate Residency Program, Graduate Family Medicine Residency Program, and Psychiatry Continuing Medical Education Course. An online knowledge building environment, Knowledge Forum, supported the knowledge building work which was conducted over a series of investigations lasting 1 to 16 weeks, with the investigations largely conducted as add-ons to course work. Fifty-seven participants (teachers and students) were engaged in these four contexts; 75% volunteered for the add-on component. Thirty-six months after the pilot investigations the four professors were interviewed to assess current practices and beliefs. Analyses focus on barriers and challenges in integrating knowledge building principles and technologies into medical education. Discourse analysis revealed expert-dominated discourse---in many ways right-answer-driven and exam-based, and leaving little room for student contributions, constructive engagement with authoritative sources, or self- and group-assessment. Teacher-generated activities, along with a curriculum with large amounts of prescribed information to be learned, made it difficult for students to find time to work creatively with ideas, consult additional sources, or reflect on diagnoses and prescriptions. The belief that knowledge innovation should occur after the acquisition of foundational knowledge, not in parallel, reflected a tension between espoused ideals and "add-on" status for knowledge building pedagogics and technologies. Results are consistent with the literature on change, suggesting that reform will be slow, but propelled by prevailing expectations of change and new knowledge media.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».