Understanding Parent Support for Physical Activity and Motor Skill Development during Early Childhood
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Physical activity (PA) during early childhood is associated with physical, cognitive and mental health benefits and is predictive of PA across the lifespan. The development of fundamental movement skills (FMS) in the early years provides the foundation for lifelong PA participation. In the early years, parents are among the most influential to a child’s development and help shape their learning and behaviours. A better understanding of how parents support children’s PA and FMS is necessary to help address the declining rates of PA and FMS among young children. This doctoral research program consisted of three independent and complimentary studies. Study 1 was a feasibility study that examined parents’ (n=20) usage and perceptions of the acceptability and feasibility of an online parent-mediated physical literacy intervention for preschool-aged children. The findings from this study suggested that while online approaches may be a feasible way to engage parents of young children, further investigation into the theoretical determinants of parent PA and FMS support was warranted. Study 2 and 3 focused on gaining an in-depth understanding of the role of parents for supporting PA and FMS in early childhood. In Study 2, moderation analyses were used to examine the relationship between parent support, child PA and motor skills among 589 children aged four to five years old. Parent support had a significant, positive relationship with motor skills among children who engaged in relatively low levels of PA (B=5.96, p=0.004). Similarly, parent support had a positive relationship with child PA among children with relatively low (B=2.49, p=0.066) and moderate (B=0.90, p=0.372) motor skills. Study 3 sought to examine the antecedents to parent PA and FMS support using a mixed-methods study design. Positioned within the multi-process action control framework, a cross-sectional design was used to survey 124 parents of children aged three to four years on reflective (e.g., attitudes), regulatory (e.g., planning) and reflexive (e.g., habit) processes related to PA and FMS support. Follow-up semi-structured interviews were conducted with a subset of 20 parents to gain a more nuanced understanding of parent PA and FMS support behaviours. Survey findings demonstrated that parents’ intentions and support behaviours for child PA and FMS were associated with a combination of reflective, regulatory and reflexive processes. Interview findings highlighted the ways by which parents viewed support for PA and FMS differently and the unique barriers and facilitators to PA and FMS support. The collective findings from this doctoral research program provide evidence that parent support influences child PA and FMS in the early years. Importantly, this program of research provides the practical and theoretical foundations that can be used to inform future development and testing of parent PA and FMS support interventions to increase PA and FMS in young children.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».