Living an elementary school curriculum: rethinking reform through a narrative classroom inquiry with a teacher and her students into the learning of mathematics : life lessons from Bay Street Community School
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study, situated in a long-term Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada Research Project, explores teacher knowledge and reform in education. I work with one teacher, Janine O'Neil, examining her mathematics education practice as it unfolds in her classroom. My study spans two years of classroom participation and observation followed by another year of research in Bay Street Community School's larger community. My research phenomena emerges in response to the reform environment shaping the North American context of education. I examine how reforms to mathematics education are experienced in an elementary classroom. As my narrative classroom inquiry progresses, complexities of classroom life with Janine and her students in Room 34/35 enfold me. The complexities create tensions that are layered throughout my research and writing. Section I, a narrative analysis, begins with a description of a grade 3/4 mathematics lesson, Remembrance Day Math. Then, I explore the meaning of this classroom experience using a three-dimensional axes of narrative inquiry: place, temporality and the personal and social relationship. The importance of teaching and learning mathematics as contextualized in experience emerges as a pivotal understanding. Section II, a curricular analysis, begins with a description of a grade 3/4 mathematics lesson based on an exploratory activity into relationships between whole numbers, fractions, and ratios (third grade), and a problem-solving activity (fourth grade). Using the notion of curriculum commonplaces to reconstruct a mathematics education experience in an elementary classroom, I analyze this lesson from the perspectives of the teacher, social milieu, subject matter, and learner. I find that classroom curriculum results from the negotiation of tensions between the learner, curriculum, and community needs. Section III, a narrative reconceptualization of reform in education, consists of three chapters. The first is a study into the relationship between personal and social influences in the construction of teacher knowledge. The second is an account of a school-based reform and how this initiative becomes part of a teacher's practice. I argue that framing notions of education reform in terms of learning and growth is beneficial. The final chapter looks backward into and forward from this inquiry.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».