Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the month of March, the world again had an opportunity to celebrate the twin international events.The first was on March 8 th (International Women's Day) and the second on March 21 st (The International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination).Naturally, the magnitude of such celebrations vary from geographic region to geographic region and from country to country.Yet, with much disappointment, one can hardly avoid noticing that the infectious energy of the 1970s and 80s is lacking from the recent celebrations of the Women's Day events.Likewise, the outrage against racial segregation, apartheid and state-violence which formed the basis of the United Nations Declaration of the Elimination of Racial Discrimination ( 1966) is muted at best.What happened since the 1970s and 80s to erode some of the positive energy to demand and initiate social change?The optimists can argue that in the majority of the countries, including some remote and traditionbound patches of the globe, the most severe limitations against women have been mostly addressed if not completely resolved.Indeed, observations and statistical information abound to support such up-beat assertions.For example, who can forget the images of some Afghani women shedding their claustrophobic burkas and who can forget the victoriously raised purple-ink-stained fingers of the Iraqi women who were allowed to vote after a long period of oppression?Optimists can also make numerous positive claims in terms of race and ethnic relations.For example, even the ultra-conservative US Republicans recently chose a black woman to serve as the Secretary of the State.The cold war is long over and legalized apartheid has been abolished in South Africa.Moreover, the malevolence of ethnic cleansing in Rwanda, Bosnia, Chechia etc., is no longer making the daily headlines and evening-news nightmares.Regardless of the degree of one's optimism, however, the darker side of the coin also requires some acknowledgement.Just to give an example, there is a worrisome resignation in the masses about women's issues.This resignation is visible in the developed as well as the less developed worlds, although its causes may be quite different.In the west, there is a heightened sense, albeit mostly erroneous, that gender equality has been reached.Ironically, this belief is equally shared by young men and women.In contrast, in the less developed world, the existing problems of poverty, ethnic or racial strife, political instability and even natural disasters are so overwhelming that an in-depth focus on women's issues may not be palatable for most.For race and culture-based issues and problems, even a misguided level of resignation is not possible.The 'we versus them' and the 'good versus evil' rhetoric of most western political and economic decisionmakers are trickling down to dangerous polarizations.France and
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,497 | 0,394 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».