Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The interviews were then analysed in greater depth in order to produce a grounded theory. Three overarching categories emerged in this analysis: stakeholders' roles, attitude toward early intervention, and attitude toward autism. Examination of stakeholders' understanding of each other's roles revealed that many parents were unclear about the role of psychologists in TPAS. Moreover, there was a diversity of opinions regarding parental involvement in the program. Analysis of stakeholders' attitudes toward early intervention revealed that most stakeholders, parents and staff alike, did not subscribe to the basic principles of early intervention. Finally, analysis of stakeholders' attitudes toward autism revealed that a medical/deficit approach to autism prevailed. A different approach, viewing children with autism as having different motivations and needs, was markedly less dominant. The medical/deficit approach dominated stakeholders' understanding of autism, of early intervention, and of the way TPAS works. The objective of the study was to gain an in-depth understanding of parent and staff perceptions of preschool autism programs. Forty-eight individuals who were involved with the Toronto Preschool Autism Service (TPAS), a preschool intervention program serving children ages two to six in the Greater Toronto Area were interviewed for this study. Guided by the "logic model" approach, the qualitative analysis produced two alternative models that described the way the program works. These models were presented to the stakeholders in three focus groups where stakeholders had the opportunity to generate a theoretical model based on their understanding of the findings brought before them. These models were synthesized into a final model that was again presented to stakeholders and finalized. The final logic model is an important product of this dissertation with implications for program evaluation, and further research in this field. The model suggests that the emphasis in the literature on intelligence as the foremost outcome indicator of program success is unwarranted. Instead, the model suggests more emphasis on mediating factors such as quality of implementation and child and family characteristics, as well as on evaluating several short- and long-term goals. Additional specific recommendations regarding future quantitative evaluations based on this model are outlined in the body of this work.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».