Teachers’ Ongoing Profesional Learning: A Ten-year Qualitative Longitudinal Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This qualitative longitudinal study investigates changes in teachers’ professional learning over the first ten years of their careers. I explore how teachers’ personal lives, their school context, and the larger policy context shaped their professional learning during this period. The main data source consisted of yearly interviews with four Ontario teachers from 2004 to 2014. Five main findings emerged from the analysis. First, the participants’ learning in years 1 to 3 was largely driven by their efforts to survive in the profession, and it was focused on building their classroom teaching practice. Second, I identified a major change in teachers’ learning in their third and fourth years of teaching, specifically the participants developed an ability to become self-directed in their learning. They became more selective in choosing learning opportunities that helped them to diversify their teaching repertoire and to re-examine their vision of teaching. Third, teachers’ learning was shaped by their passions; these focused on subject matter, student engagement, learning, and personal interest. Fourth, the school context and teachers’ learning mutually influenced each other. Whereas the school shaped teachers’ learning, teachers’ leadership roles, while conducting professional development for their colleagues, shaped the context in return. Fifth, the policy context was driven by an accountability agenda that established links between teachers’ learning and students’ achievement on standardized assessments. This mandate guided the policy priorities to focus on the grades and curricular areas assessed (i.e., Grades 3 and 6, literacy and mathematics). This had the effect of restricting teachers’ learning. These findings contribute to our understanding of the ongoing and complex nature of teachers’ learning. One of the major implications for teacher education programs is the acknowledging of the necessity of exploring the connection between the personal and the professional dimensions of teaching through eliciting teachers’ passions. Implications for schools include the importance of promoting conference-like events where teachers can share their pedagogical innovations and learning, and also contribute to whole school learning. Implications for teacher learning policies point to the value of providing space for teachers’ voice and choice in professional development programs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,028 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».