Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<b>Aim:</b> City&Co aimed to develop an innovative tool for a community-based, mixed validated quantitative and qualitative assessment of age-friendly cities, that can be used in multiple countries. This tool, called Geoportal, should help cities to plan for and implement age-friendly strategies using direct input from older citizens. Moreover, this tool itself has been developed with the active involvement of both older people and policy makers (city workers), in order to build capacity through local ecosystems at the city- and neighbourhood level. To provide guidance for the tool’s implementation and execution of plans, manuals and a manifesto have been published. Four cities were involved: The Hague in the Netherlands, Kraków and Wrocław in Poland and Bucharest in Romania. <br><br> <b>Methodology & data:</b> The geoportal followed the user-centred design approach: a web-based solution for city workers, using Geographical Information Systems (GIS), with an integrated audit tool to be used by older citizens. We build on the quantifiable spatial indicators’ framework by Davern et al. [2020], which assists the assessment of age-friendly cities using a GIS methodology. In addition, outcomes are superimposed over socio-environmental vulnerability data from the 4 cities through a map overlay approach [Szewrański et al., 2018]. The integrated audit tool was co-created with older citizens from the four cities using multiple co-creation sessions.<br><br> Multiple data used in the geoportal were collected through various methods: 1) Quantitative survey data of four AFCCQs, which were translated and validated using the Consensus-based Standards for Selection of Health Measurement Instruments, supplemented by additional questions on sustainability. Data were collected in four cities: The Hague, Kraków, Wrocław and Bucharest; 2) Qualitative pictures and comments tagged to a GPS location taken of public spaces and neighbourhoods by older people in the four cities using the geoportal over a three to six-month period, following the work by Barrie et al. [2019] and a community-based approach where older people are involved as citizen scientists. A hot spot analysis was made when evaluating the geoportal, showing the results on city maps. In addition, three co-creation sessions in the four cities were conducted, two with older people and one with older people and city workers together, to draft a strategic age-friendly agenda on evidence-informed policy and actions using the data collected in the project as content, resulting in a manifesto, published in four languages.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle