Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 2017, Leatherback Sea Turtles were re-listed under the Species at Risk Act (SARA) as two populations (Atlantic and Pacific), both Endangered. Leatherback Sea Turtles in Atlantic Canada belong to the Northwest Atlantic (NWA) subpopulation, which is listed as Endangered through the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List. A Recovery Potential Assessment according to current guidance was not completed for the Leatherback Sea Turtle prior to its listing under SARA. The NWA Leatherback subpopulation is in decline, with a recent index abundance estimate of 20,659 mature nesting females at consistently monitored beaches and a regional nesting abundance decrease of 9.32% (CI: -12.9% to -5.57%) annually from 2008–2017. In the Northwest Atlantic, Leatherbacks use Canadian waters seasonally in the summer months. High use areas of core foraging habitat have been identified throughout Atlantic Canadian waters. There is no existing evidence to suggest that Leatherbacks are habitat limited in Atlantic Canadian waters. In Atlantic Canada, Leatherbacks do not come ashore and are broadly distributed through coastal and offshore waters. As such, there is no current method to accurately determine the number of turtles using these waters. Efforts are underway to correct for biases in estimating abundance of various species in aerial survey areas, which may produce a minimum estimate of the number of Leatherbacks using these waters. Throughout their range, Leatherbacks encounter a variety of natural and anthropogenic threats, with incidental fishery interactions identified as a leading cause of mortality within this subpopulation. While interactions do occur between Leatherbacks and fisheries in Atlantic Canadian waters, available data suggest that fishery interactions occur most frequently outside of Canadian waters, especially in waters adjacent to some high-density nesting beaches. At-sea mortality in Canada, and elsewhere, may be reduced through adaptive fishing methods (i.e., ropeless fishing gear, time-area closures, reduction of ghost gear). A spatial-temporal analysis of the overlap between fishery and Leatherback distributions should occur prior to the establishment of any new fisheries or potential changes in the seasonality or spatial extent of existing fisheries are considered. There is some scope for harm to Leatherbacks in Atlantic Canadian waters; however, human-induced threats should be reduced to the fullest extent possible throughout the Northwest Atlantic and regular assessments should be conducted to evaluate the impact of Canadian fisheries on this subpopulation. A recovery goal is to increase the number of Leatherbacks in the broader NWA subpopulation by maintaining or increasing the number of adult and subadult Leatherbacks using Atlantic Canadian waters. Progress towards this goal may be achieved by reducing human-induced interactions and mortalities in Atlantic Canada, supporting Leatherback persistent use of Canadian waters as core foraging habitat, and continuing efforts to monitor Leatherback spatial and temporal distributions. The NWA Leatherback subpopulation is not currently on course to meet the recovery goal. International collaboration (through activities such as nesting beach monitoring and protection, increased survey efforts throughout foraging habitats, and reduction of fishery nteractions throughout the NWA Leatherback range) is necessary for the recovery of this subpopulation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».