Okanagan Sockeye
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Okanagan Sockeye salmon make up a single stock management unit (SMU), which contains a single conservation unit (CU) with three distinct spawning populations; these rear in Osoyoos Lake, Skaha Lake, and Okanagan Lake. Naturally returning spawners were re-established in Skaha Lake in 2011 and in Okanagan Lake in 2022, due to modifications to access barriers that allowed passage. The current escapement goal for Okanagan Sockeye salmon was set at 35,500 based on Hyatt and Rankin’s (1999) study, but that target has since been exceeded in 12 of the past 20 years for the Osoyoos Lake population alone (2004-2023). Furthermore, improvements in water management, changes in stock assessment, habitat restoration, and range reintroduction due to improved fish passage have fundamentally changed the structure of, and our understanding of, the stock. Therefore, it no longer reflects the capacity of the habitats available to Sockeye salmon in the Okanagan basin. Estimates of current habitat capacity, and potential reference points, were explored using three alternative approaches: (1) spawning habitat capacity estimates based on detailed habitat mapping of flow and gravel sizes (all three lakes); (2) rearing habitat capacity estimates based on in-lake sampling (e.g., stomach contents) and food web modeling (Osoyoos and Skaha Lakes); and (3) estimating reference points based on spawner-recruit models (Osoyoos Lake). Estimates of spawning habitat capacity were found to be the most appropriate approach for determining population status and candidate management reference points, because consistent and reliable estimates could be developed for all three populations. Median spawning habitat capacity for all three populations combined ranged from 180,754 to 205,588. Wild Salmon Policy (WSP) status was evaluated for the combined spawner time series for Osoyoos and Skaha lakes, based on four standard metrics (relative abundance, absolute abundance, long-term trend and percent change over three generations) and associated benchmarks using established methods. The final status was assessed as Amber with high confidence. However, the CU faces serious threats from climate change and is at high risk of declining into Red status in the near future. The Okanagan Sockeye salmon SMU, which contains one CU that is not currently Red status, is considered to be above the Limit Reference Point (LRP) under the Fish Stock Provisions of the modernized Fisheries Act. Habitat-based estimates of the number of spawners that maximizes recruits (SMAX; corresponding to full use of the available spawning habitat) for all three lakes were used to identify candidate management targets for the Okanagan Sockeye SMU. A candidate target range of 96,000-135,000 spawners would approximate an escapement goal based on SMSY (as 50-70% SMAX). A candidate target range of 192,000-231,000 spawners could be used to represent a goal of maximizing total production (100-120% SMAX). Escapement goals specific to each lake population are also estimated and provided. Okanagan Sockeye salmon are already being impacted by climate change. Climate change effects will likely increase the frequency of adverse conditions throughout their lifecycle (e.g., thermal barriers during adult return migration, increased egg mortality due to freezing). Preserving diverse phenotypes may increase long-term resilience and should be considered as part of management planning.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,036 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».