Spring spawning Atlantic Herring rebuilding plan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The main source of serious harm to the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (NAFO Division 4T 4Vn) Atlantic Herring spring spawning stock productivity and the probable cause of stock decline was environmentally-driven recruitment failure since 1992 associated with a regime shift from cold water/high recruitment to warmer water/low recruitment. Other sources of serious harm include reduced growth, increased predation-driven natural mortality, high fishing mortality during and after the stock decline in the late 1990s and early 2000s, reduced fecundity, and a state of low production and low biomass. A review of candidate spawning stock biomass (SSB) reference points identified the Limit Reference Point (LRP) of 0.4BMSYproxy. A proposed Upper Stock Reference was 0.8BMSYproxy, a target reference point of BMSYproxy, and a removal reference of FMSYproxy. The stock has been below the LRP and in the Critical Zone of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Precautionary Approach framework since 2001 (previously 2002). The current definition of the rebuilding target from the rebuilding plan is that the stock must have a 75% probability of being at or above the LRP. It should be amended to include that: (1) the stock must be at or above this level for 2 consecutive years (rebuilt state), and (2) population projections must also show that the stock is likely to continue its positive trajectory under a directed fishery for 2 years after this rebuilt state has been achieved. Even in the absence of fishing mortality, the SSB is unlikely to increase to the rebuilding target under prevailing stock productivity and ecosystem conditions or under various scenarios of natural mortality. In order for the stock to rebuild, recruitment must increase to the intermediate to high levels observed prior to the mid-1990s. With annual fishery removals (directed, bycatch, bait, science) of 150 to 500 tonnes (t), it is expected that SSB will decrease by a small amount (1 to 4%) over a decade compared to no fishery removals. These differences may be negligible because of the associated uncertainty. The main source of spring spawning Atlantic Herring bycatch is the fall season Atlantic Herring fisheries. Historically, the fall mobile gear fishery has landed more spring spawning Herring, however in half of the years from 2017 to 2022, the fixed gear fishery landed the majority. Bycatch in the fall fixed gear fishery is greatest in the South and North regions with minimal contribution from the Middle region. The removals from the spring season bait fishery are highly uncertain, but recent analysis indicates that they were higher than previously assumed and reported. In the event that this bait fishery reopens, removals should be monitored and reported to accurately estimate the associated fishing mortality. An additional measurable objective of the rebuilding plan is increasing the proportion of older fish to levels observed historically (1978-2004). Rebuilding progress will be tracked using the stock assessment model. The periodic review of the rebuilding plan should be set to every 4 years (every other stock assessment cycle) unless the stock productivity or external factors influencing stock dynamics change.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».